| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
isa-d

Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 2984 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:21 am Post subject: IBM CISC processor |
|
|
I get this processor board from an AS/400 9404 E10
it has a CISC processor but which is between these 3 chips?
it has 2 crystals (30.77000 MHz and 22.118440 MHz) and the slopes seem connect them with the chip at right in the first picture
what do you think, is it the processor? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UMMR

Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 381 Location: Udine, ITALY
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
AFAIK the IBM AS/400 CISC processors aren't single-chip CPUs.
Paolo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isa-d

Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 2984 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| UMMR wrote: | Hello,
AFAIK the IBM AS/400 CISC processors aren't single-chip CPUs.
Paolo |
I sought information about this processor, but have not found anything, can you tell me where can I find them? thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
An for us currently nameless 48bit-processor and indirect
predecessor of 64bit RISCs Cobra and Muskie
(which were anon predecessors of the RS64).
The architecture was optimized for data serving so likely alot
of cache-memory and separated memory- and bus-controllers,
no FPU at all I think. There could be already first steps in pipelining.
Just less silvercans like in IBMs S/38 which was the forerunner of AS/400-systems.
On your board one of the silvercans is probably
an integer execution unit (like IBMlers are used to say) and
could be called CPU. In small S/38's the "processor" is two small
boards with more than ten silvercans if I remember correctly.
Question here is if ALUs and control, decode, registers... are sitting in
the same package, considering the mass of silvercans likely not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|