| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:50 pm Post subject: QX9650 vs Q9650 differences |
 |
|
Other than the TDP, is there any difference in performance and overclocking potential between the Q9650 and the QX9650?
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No difference in performance in stock.
QX has unlocked multiplier but Q has newer stepping (probably slightly more energy efficient).
If you use LN2 QX will win (Q will be imited by fsb), but for daily use Q might be better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KaanadWanchoo
Joined: 08 Aug 2019
Posts: 2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crazybubba64
Joined: 03 Jul 2018
Posts: 1371
Location: WI, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2019 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Q9650 is the E0 stepping, so it has some newer technologies and instructions.
In most real-world applications the chips are essentially identical at stock speeds.
_________________
My collection |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
