| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 1:19 am Post subject: |
 |
|
One of the few memory-to-memory architectures,
I like it despite its slowness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very nice article!
Did SMC actually produced 9900? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | Very nice article!
Did SMC actually produced 9900? |
I haven't seen one, but they are referenced in more then one book I have, and multiple editions, looks like it should be one to try to find
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yy2013
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Posts: 739
Location: Nagoya, Japan
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for your reply. Very interesting.
| CPUShack wrote: | | Anonymous wrote: | Very nice article!
Did SMC actually produced 9900? |
I haven't seen one, but they are referenced in more then one book I have, and multiple editions, looks like it should be one to try to find |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}