| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MDR Guest
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:35 pm Post subject: Upgrading Intel Atom processor from Pineview to Cedarview |
|
|
Hello and thanks in advance for reading my posting...
I recently got this nice little HP Mini 210-2050NR netbook and its carrying case from a friend who barely used it. It is the HD version and in 'like new' condition. I have been considering the purchase of a table since I need something small and portable and then this came along. Hopefull this will fill the bill...with a bit of tweaking (i.e. upgrading)
What I've done to it already:
1) My friend wanted the hard drive so I removed it, wiped it clean, and installed it in an enclosure I had for her to use as an external drive. I then replaced the hard drive with a solid state drive
2) Upgraded RAM to the maximum of 2GB DDR3-12800
3) Fresh install of Win 7 Ultimate 32 bit and all drivers.
4) Ordered a Broadcom BCM970015 mini PCI-e decoder card (to be installed once received) to improve the poor graphics performance. Based on what I've read, the Broadcom card will drastically improve the performance of the machine by unburdening the already overworked CPU. So far, all told, I've spent around $80 for the parts mentioned above... Not bad.
Now onto my question:
As my last step I MAY also want to upgrade the processor. The current processor is the Intel Atom N455 (single core, 2 threads, 1.6GHz, 512mb L2 cache) which is based on the Pineview (45 nm) architecture. What I'd like to know is if I can I install a higher level N processor (N2600) which is based on the Cedarview (32 nm) architecture? I suspect the answer is "no" based on the difference in architecture, but I thought that maybe it might work if since both use and support the same FCBGA559 socket.
If nothing else, I know that I can definitely install the N570 processor as that was the highest level Atom processor in the Pineview family (this would give me a dual core 1.6GHz processor and double L2 cache and the number of threads it can handle).
I know that some of you may be thinking "why is he even bothering"... Well, I really like this netbook and it's already running well save for the abysmal graphics performance. I may find, after installing the Broadcom card, that I don't need to upgrade the processor - but since I know how to change the CPU (done it many, many times) and since the higher processors can be had for around $20, I figure "why not". Besides which, I enjoy doing this kind of stuff.
Anyway, thanks again for reading - any and all information offered will be greatly appreciated.
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm afraid the FCBGA is directly soldered to the mainboard, so it is not possible to change the CPU. I'm not 100% certain, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MDR
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | I assume you have the setup to desolder and solder BGA chips in?
The Cedarville wont work, but a faster pineview should. |
I didn't realize the CPU was soldered to the MB on this machine. If that's the case, then the CPU is staying as it is.
The Broadcom card will hopefully address my last and only complaint - the not-so-good graphics which is the weakest link left in the chain.
Thanks for your input. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MDR
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| H3nrik V! wrote: | | I'm afraid the FCBGA is directly soldered to the mainboard, so it is not possible to change the CPU. I'm not 100% certain, though. |
Hmmmm.... Good point. I guess I'll find out when I take this thing apart - which I'm about to do in 15 minutes because this inquiring mind wants to know. Will post back with my findings...
T.I.A. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cedrik

Joined: 16 Oct 2011 Posts: 2008 Location: Rom�nia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mavroxur

Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 1192 Location: Wichita Falls, TX
|
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There are no socketed Atom processors. All are BGA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|