| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vegeta

Joined: 13 Apr 2013 Posts: 7049
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Informative article, thanks! _________________ Wanted: 4 x VT-25-A tubes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 4015 Location: Estonia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yy2013
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Posts: 739 Location: Nagoya, Japan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice article! Thank you.
Also the datasheet of 588BP2 by frag_ was useful information for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking at the datasheet, the Soviet one is like the CDP1855 only by the fact it could do 8x8 multiplication, other then that, its different (no division, no cascading, not set up to work with a 1802 etc) _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 4015 Location: Estonia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, yes, I read it and it's very different multiplier.
And it's 16x16
But at least it has cool rad-hardened version - 1824BP21
http://www.155la3.ru/k1824.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vegeta

Joined: 13 Apr 2013 Posts: 7049
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Correct, though as I mentioned, they may have called it an analog to the 1855 purely to justify making it, but it certainly bares little resemblance. _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|