| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:06 pm Post subject: CPU Shack: Datatek 386 Motherboard with CPU/FPU - SOLD |
|
|
Here is a nice Datatek motherboard.
Datatek ones are kinda cool as they did everything on their own, even their own branded BIOS
It included 4-30 pin RAM slots, and 1MB of RAM (5MB max) (implemented with Intel DRAMs no less)
Processor is an Intel NG80386SX-16 C STEP
FPU is a nice PLCC Cyrix CX-83S87-16-JP
$20 and its yours _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Last edited by CPUShack on Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:43 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elar
Joined: 16 Jul 2003 Posts: 746 Location: Tallinn, Estonia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stamasd
Joined: 05 Jun 2014 Posts: 1311 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| $20 and it's mine, if you confirm that the battery hasn't leaked. Can't really tell from the angle of the picture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stamasd
Joined: 05 Jun 2014 Posts: 1311 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OK then I'll take it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chook

Joined: 29 Oct 2008 Posts: 2250 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
A 386SX-16 with no cache. That would be slooooooooow! _________________ General failure reading disk in drive A
Who's General Failure and why is he reading my disk? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kixs
Joined: 13 Aug 2015 Posts: 218 Location: EU, SI
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
386SX rarely had any cache.
I agree it will be slow. 286-16 would be faster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stamasd
Joined: 05 Jun 2014 Posts: 1311 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know exactly how slow it is. This is not my first 386SX-16. The other one is a Magnavox 386 computer. The neat thing about the other one is that in theory the CPU is upgradable, as it's on a daughtercard (proprietary connector). In practice though finding a proper card to upgrade it with has proven a futile enterprise.
Closeup of the CPU card (not my picture, but mine is identical)
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stamasd
Joined: 05 Jun 2014 Posts: 1311 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | | They do at least make the clip on upgrades for them |
Only works for 386SX later than the 16 (386SX20 and later). The SX16 doesn't have the pin required to disable the original CPU. The SX20 and following were a different revision of the silicon. There is some speculation that there were some SX16 made in the latter revision, but I never saw any evidence that those existed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stamasd
Joined: 05 Jun 2014 Posts: 1311 Location: Connecticut
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stamasd
Joined: 05 Jun 2014 Posts: 1311 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't know. Neither datasheet has info about silicon steppings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|