| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tlccomp
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1212
Location: Southeast Wisconsin, USA
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:55 pm Post subject: 1994, Week 53? |
 |
|
CPU is a little rough. Date code 1994, Week 53? 
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 98' week 05 if I'm not mistaken...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tlccomp
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1212
Location: Southeast Wisconsin, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GlinGlin wrote: | | 98' week 05 if I'm not mistaken...... |
If you're refering to the A80501... That's the part number. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:11 pm Post subject: Re: 1994, Week 53? |
|
|
| tlccomp wrote: | CPU is a little rough. Date code 1994, Week 53?
|
yup its uncommon but you will see it
there are 52 weeks and 1 day per year, so Dec 31st (a saturday in 1994) is technically week 53
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tlccomp
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1212
Location: Southeast Wisconsin, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:44 pm Post subject: Re: 1994, Week 53? |
|
|
[quote="CPUShack"] | tlccomp wrote: | CPU is a little rough. Date code 1994, Week 53?
yup its uncommon but you will see it
there are 52 weeks and 1 day per year, so Dec 31st (a saturday in 1994) is technically week 53 |
Someone had to work on New Years eve..... bummer 
Thanks for the insight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd
Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AAAAAAAAhhh  hehehe!
I'm sorry !
I didn't keep looking but I see it now , on the bottom !
Big oooops there 
But yup, tis L4530266 as in L(94')(week53)0266 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: Re: 1994, Week 53? |
|
|
[quote="tlccomp"] | CPUShack wrote: | | tlccomp wrote: | CPU is a little rough. Date code 1994, Week 53?
yup its uncommon but you will see it
there are 52 weeks and 1 day per year, so Dec 31st (a saturday in 1994) is technically week 53 |
Someone had to work on New Years eve..... bummer
Thanks for the insight. |
the die was made 433 (week 33, 20 weeks earlier) the CPU was assembled / tested on New years eve, in Malay, I doubt the workers their get it off.
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:16 pm Post subject: Re: 1994, Week 53? |
|
|
| tlccomp wrote: | | Someone had to work on New Years eve..... bummer |
I doubt it was made on New Year's eve. Because beginning of each week is usually tied to specific day of week, probably Sunday, the first week of a year may be shorter than 7 days. This leaves more days for the 53rd week.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:28 pm Post subject: Re: 1994, Week 53? |
|
|
| gshv wrote: | | tlccomp wrote: | | Someone had to work on New Years eve..... bummer |
I doubt it was made on New Year's eve. Because beginning of each week is usually tied to specific day of week, probably Sunday, the first week of a year may be shorter than 7 days. This leaves more days for the 53rd week.
Gennadiy |
Its possible but I do know that Intel typical runs its plants 24/7 3 shifts per day. Assembly/test you can stop on occassion, but wafer fab is very very hard to stop and start.
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JAC
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 3469
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
This has had me looking at the date codes a little more.. just from looking at my scanned pentium chips, the lag time from wafer to assembly is about 13 weeks for production chips and about half that, as you would expect, for the Q-specs.
486's are little quicker with a lag time of about 10 weeks.
Here is possibly an obscure competition to run, who has the biggest lag from wafer to assembly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
