| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CPUbar
Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 238
Location: P.R.China
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:55 am Post subject: A obvious fake intel 80486sx-16 |
 |
|
Fake but interesting . 20-->16 make a lower speed !!!???
_________________
CPUbar |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 3469
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SX406 is a SX-20 Mhz ... why fake down to 16Mhz? - this makes me wonder if this is faked for collectors? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUbar
Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 238
Location: P.R.China
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
For collector !!! It is too obvious.
_________________
CPUbar |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JAC
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 3469
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUbar wrote: | | For collector !!! It is too obvious. |
you underestimate the naivety of collectors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUbar
Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 238
Location: P.R.China
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | | or someone got pissed that it didnt work at 20MHz, and marked it 16 lol |
I think that is the most logical answer. LooooooooooooooL
_________________
CPUbar |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spongiforme
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 168
Location: Montpellier, France
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Looks like 28 to me, under the paint. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chip68
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 1024
Location: Central Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
No such animal... Besides, the central slash is far too pronounced for it to be an "8."
- CMW |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
