AMD K7 sempron vs Athlon XP
Goto page 1, 2  Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern CPUs - upgrades, overclocking and troubleshooting
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fluffen75
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:05 pm    Post subject: AMD K7 sempron vs Athlon XP Reply with quote

If the rating on Athlon XPs are to be compaird to Pentium 4 cpus, and Semprons to Celerons, how do i compair them against each other? Is a sempron 2800/128 faster then a Atlon XP 2200/256 etc

Fluffen
Back to top
Marcin



Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My theory is that : Semprons are very similar to Athlons but Celerons are very far from Pentiums in performance.

There is no rule to comparing exactly. Read tests on popular benchmark sites or if you thinking about CPU upgrade download SiSoft Sandra and test by own.

_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
Tested : )
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the advice, in most apps the sempron is faster, BUT now i´ve confuses myself even more, there are bigger differances in performance depending on the moterboaseds. I have a long night of testing combos : )
Back to top
jd



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ouch !!! This isn't a good reference Marcin Shocked


icon_poke

I'll dumb it up a little....


Sempron VS Athlon XP you say:

Sempron = Internet Surfer

Athlon XP= GAMER !!!



Why do you think they quite making Sempron so quickly? It was a major mistake and could not be anything close to an Athlon !
So it is very simple, if your gonna be a beginner and have no knowledge of pc's, then buy an Athlon XP ! If you have plenty of pc experience, then buy an Athlon XP ! Very Happy 1+1=2






Later



JD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Marcin



Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jd wrote:


Sempron VS Athlon XP you say:

Sempron = Internet Surfer

Athlon XP= GAMER !!!

No no no. That is bad explane.
Sempron = Athlon in most applications

To fluffen75. If you compare Sempron Socket A to Athlon XP you must take CPUs with same FSB (333 MHz) and same motherboard (chipset). That I thought by compare Semprons VS Athlons and Celerons VS Pentiums. Then you can get CLEVER answer.

BTW. Athlons in same class had always more cache L2. For what you need more cache memory ? For video working and making archive files (zip rar etc). In games is small difference so we can't say Semprons are for internet and Athlons are for gamers.

_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
jd



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL.......



Let me try again !


Try playing BF2 sidebyside with a Sempron VS an Athlon XP ! Then come an tell me which one you prefer Wink
I'm not talking about the books, the specs and ratings....I'm talking about first hand experience and experimenting for 6 years ! When Sempron came out, I was asked to start testing this in gaming mode next to my old system. (Athlon XP2400+) System after system, had glitches during game play with Sempron ! IT IS NOT AND NEVER WILL BE A GAMER'S CHOICE CPU ! Meanwhile ,the Athlon XP came true in every combat I could dish out at it.

...and yes, I used the same memory, Video card during all tests. You got to think, I probly totaled well over 400 systems in 3 years in game play, and none of them with a Sempron came true at all! That's sais is all for me ! No , matter what the "books, specs or ratings " of the Sempron are, they never past any of my performence tests during game play VS Athlon XP.


JD



JD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
gshv



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sempron socket 462 processors are the same as Athlon XP processors, they only have Celeron rating, which is approximately the same as Pentium 4 rating + 300. For example, Sempron socket 462 3000+ is about as fast as Athlon XP 2700+. When comparing faster socket 754 Semprons with Athlon 64 the difference will be a bit larger - 400 MHz or so. That is Sempron 3400+ is about as fast as Athlon 64 3000+. So, to respond to original question, I think that Semron 754 with 128 K L2 cache will be faster than Athlon XP 2200+/256.

Gennadiy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
Marcin



Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jd more details about sempron that you used with compare Athlon Xp 2400.

I agree with gshv. That is exactly compare which you asked for.

_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
jd



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

icon_no





Very sad...

I don't know in how many different languages I must try to explain what I'm trying to say...but it is obviously useless in here because some of you all rely on books ,facts, ratings , paper trails and some, just plain Intel favortism !

Part#3 of my explination:
I'll keep it short'n sweet !-------> I don't go by books, IT up the ass professionals quotes, online cpu ratings or anything else other then...

------------>Sitting on my ass putting 2 machines side-by-side and firing-up BF2 and watch the choke that comes out of Sempron !

You got to think of it my way for a sec. I am a MAJOR AMD FAN . For me to put down my own cpu brands is enough said for a reason. Sempron never impressed me with gaming performence, what so ever ! It plain sucks ! It reminds me of putting a Duron next to an Athlon !



JD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Marcin



Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So BF2 must have some kind of bug Razz Try Battlefield 2142. Just kidding Wink
OK You know something and I know something. Let's leave that as is.

_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
jd



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very Happy





Just trying to point out what I was going threw in comparing cpu's.
But I guess when it comes down to it, everyone has a second opinion about different chips, no matter the "reviews" given !


So, my advice, if you got a socket462 motherboard, don't waste the boards potential by putting a Sempron on it Wink





JD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Marcin



Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sometimes difference in performance between two CPUs is smaller than difference between two chipsets with same CPUs. Remember that too.
_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
jd



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

..........I have took note of that, but they were all mostly VIA chipset boards.








But ya.....like you said, we'll leave it be Smile


JD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Marcin



Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL I wrote to fluffen Wink I know you knew that.
_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
jd



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 1562
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah.....I saw that after....


But he really is better off getting an XP Athlon in my opinion for his 462mob. icon_blahblah

I'm I anoying anyone with this yet? Laughing



JD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern CPUs - upgrades, overclocking and troubleshooting All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group