| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:16 am Post subject: Isn't it in the wrong category? |
 |
|
I take this snapshot from Intersil 286 section of CPUPHOTOLIBRARY.COM.
But I am confused with the right one, I think it should be a Harris 286 rather than an Intersil 286.
What do you think about it?
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrmunro
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 3149
Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
If I`m not mistaken Intercil bought out Harris.
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jrmunro wrote: | If I`m not mistaken Intercil bought out Harris.
John |
a lil more complex
Intersil was bought by GE became GE Solid state, then was sold to Harris, which then spun it off again as, Intersil
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrmunro
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 3149
Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | | jrmunro wrote: | If I`m not mistaken Intercil bought out Harris.
John |
a lil more complex
Intersil was bought by GE became GE Solid state, then was sold to Harris, which then spun it off again as, Intersil |
Thanks John, I know there was a thread somewhere quite a while ago about mergers but couldn`t find it.
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok, thank you sir, from your conversation i learn more. 
But I still think this cpu should be catogried as Harris since it has logo of Harris while the left one has logo of Intersil. Right?
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cpuswe
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 2214
Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hugo929 wrote: | | But I still think this cpu should be catogried as Harris since it has logo of Harris while the left one has logo of Intersil. Right? |
Completely right!  A simple sorting error at my side! Statistically there has to be some sorted wrong since im closing in on 4000 chips. 
_________________
My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrmunro
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 3149
Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cpuswe wrote: | | hugo929 wrote: | | But I still think this cpu should be catogried as Harris since it has logo of Harris while the left one has logo of Intersil. Right? |
Completely right! A simple sorting error at my side! Statistically there has to be some sorted wrong since im closing in on 4000 chips. |
What, your not perfect?
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cpuswe
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 2214
Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jrmunro wrote: | | Cpuswe wrote: | | hugo929 wrote: | | But I still think this cpu should be catogried as Harris since it has logo of Harris while the left one has logo of Intersil. Right? |
Completely right! A simple sorting error at my side! Statistically there has to be some sorted wrong since im closing in on 4000 chips. |
What, your not perfect?
John |
It is hard to admit, but no it does not seem like it!
_________________
My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cpuswe
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 2214
Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hugo929 wrote: | | well, Cpuswe, i just noticed that you add twice of it to harris catogory.... |
_________________
My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
haha, ok now.
still another question, why should the top two cpus are milspec while the two cpus at the bottom are not milspec?
I cannot see any obvious difference between them 
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cpuswe
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 2214
Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hugo929 wrote: | haha, ok now.
still another question, why should the top two cpus are milspec while the two cpus at the bottom are not milspec?
I cannot see any obvious difference between them |
The lower two have been compared from printing instead of milspec. The comparison is always done in the lowest category. And i do not print out all the differences.
But yes i know that the Harris category is not 100% good since there are many chips with many differences.
If you find other errors feel free to email or PM me.
/Thomas
_________________
My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Unzlbunzl
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 468
Location: Graz, Austria
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all
I could have opened a new topic but it also fits here: is there any document saying the triangle on the Harris 286s means milspec? i have a few of them and they all came from ordinary PCs. shouldnt mean milspec also extended temperature range? the harris datasheets say that cs80c286 parts are 0 -70 ° C (the narrowest range from all) 5962-9067801MXC is part number of 10 MHz -55 to +125 °C for example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
