| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kosmokrator
Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 4085
Location: Athens-GR
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:14 am Post subject: |
 |
|
WOW I HAVE AN SU072.....IS NOT INTEL GENUINE???
i search on intel sspec finder and didnt find anything....
is fake or something else happends? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:20 pm Post subject: Re: SU074? |
|
|
| hugo929 wrote: | 
I think it is not genuine although I would like it be geniune.
Right? |
Can you post a top view picture?
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's difficult to tell. It looks good to me... or maybe too good. A couple of things I'm not sure about are:
- no space between the part number and the s-spec number;
- the markings are too good (too crisp) on the top of the chip. Look at the Mask work (M) and copyright (C) - the width of the lines is too thin, that is thinner than on other boxed Pentium processors.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cpuswe
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 2214
Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would say that its a fake.
In addition to the above...
- That font has never been used by Intel on Pentiums. Compare zeros for example. Intel Pentiums has always a strike through going diagonal across the zero.
- I have not seen ICOMP 1 used on a 166, only ICOMP 2 which should be 127.
_________________
My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | Date on the back is 1997, date on the front is 1996.
A year apart is VERY unlikely. |
yes, I do notice this. this is exactly what I think the most abnormal at first sight of it. but maybe it's out of the rule for datecode on HS ?
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cpuswe wrote: | I would say that its a fake.
In addition to the above...
- That font has never been used by Intel on Pentiums. Compare zeros for example. Intel Pentiums has always a strike through going diagonal across the zero.
- I have not seen ICOMP 1 used on a 166, only ICOMP 2 which should be 127. |
I think it would be better to draw a conclusion after we see what will be showed when removing the heatsink. 
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't remove that heatsink, it was part of the original retail package.
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chiefish
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 2153
Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
In this circumstance i would think its nessesary to remove it to see if in fact its a fake or genuine. If its fake then certainly nothing lost, but if its genuine, still nothing really lost, i am sure if someone wanted this chip they would take it with or without the heatsink on.
_________________
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kosmokrator
Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 4085
Location: Athens-GR
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| +1 chiefish.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would first (as always ) check the CPUID and see if it fits with what is known for either date.
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
