| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
WFS2005

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 1526 Location: HB China
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:14 am Post subject: Strange K6-2 400 |
|
|
I check my collection and discovers this K6-2 400.
what are your opinion? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Every K6-2 in my collection has 3.3V I/O.
This chip was made by ghosts at the factory? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thomsonicus

Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 226 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What about K6-300AFR with 3.45V I/O? Common? I don't have any K6s so I'm no expert in this matter _________________ Power without the price. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have K6/300AFR and K6/300ADZ with 3.3V or with 3.45V I/O
I do not know why there are two types. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chook

Joined: 29 Oct 2008 Posts: 2250 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon wrote: | I have K6/300AFR and K6/300ADZ with 3.3V or with 3.45V I/O
I do not know why there are two types. |
With differences like this, I think you'll find that the earlier chip is the 3.45 and the later chip is the 3.3. Some of the earlier versions of the fastest K6 and K6-2 chips at the time were 'factory overclocks' and a few months later when the manufactoring ability improved they no longer needed the extra voltage.
This is the case with the K6-2 400AHZ (factory overclock) and the K6-2 400AFR later version. _________________ General failure reading disk in drive A
Who's General Failure and why is he reading my disk? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ooops, I misread the list. I do not have a K6/300ADZ with 3.3V I/O.
Chook, what you say makes sense. Unfortunately, I only have 4 relevant cpus, so not many to prove or disprove the point:
K6/300AFR 9836 3.45V
K6/300AFR 9840 3.3V
K6/300AFR 9841 3.45V
K6/300ADZ 9839 3.45V |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.8080

Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 1474 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chook wrote: | | Neon wrote: | I have K6/300AFR and K6/300ADZ with 3.3V or with 3.45V I/O
I do not know why there are two types. |
With differences like this, I think you'll find that the earlier chip is the 3.45 and the later chip is the 3.3. Some of the earlier versions of the fastest K6 and K6-2 chips at the time were 'factory overclocks' and a few months later when the manufactoring ability improved they no longer needed the extra voltage.
This is the case with the K6-2 400AHZ (factory overclock) and the K6-2 400AFR later version. |
I remember the factory overclocks, in reviews and pc magazines they stated that those cpus couldn't be pushed more, compared to intel cpus.
Thanks for this memory. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WFS2005

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 1526 Location: HB China
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have K6/300ADZ 3.45V I/O, 3.45V I/Ois not strange.
But 2.2V I/O is strange, fake or not? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
My guess is fake.
Debs is expert on this topic; maybe she will see this and offer an opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doccybrown

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 1736 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would also say fake.
Additionally there is something wrong with the
zero in the datecode... and one strange zero in "C0RE" _________________ Ordem e Progresso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iguana

Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 2456 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WFS2005

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 1526 Location: HB China
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, yes. "M" looks really not same usual K6-2.
Now, I know it's fake.
Thank everyone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMO it's a fake, as they are nominally 3.3V I/O and should work in the range 3.135V - 3.6V. These details originaly came from AMD manuals (although I can't at the moment tell you which documents, but any that refer to the 400AFR should say the same). _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|