Fan revs higher after P4 cpu upgrade

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern CPUs - upgrades, overclocking and troubleshooting
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DellDim5000
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:12 pm    Post subject: Fan revs higher after P4 cpu upgrade Reply with quote

I just successfully upgraded my stock 3GHz (530/530J) machine with a 3.8GHz (670). The machine started right up, didn't even halt for the BIOS to show the new processor data.
But now the cpu fan runs at a lot higher rpm level and gets annoyingly loud at high cpu load...Sad
Could that really be just because of the slightly higher operating temps of the 3.8? Or could anything else be wrong with the cpu causing to trigger the fan higher?
Back to top
Thandor



Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 461

PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Check out the temps with HWMonitor. If they are high (let's say 63C / 145F +) then either your cooling is inadequate or the fan/heatsink assembly isn't installed properly. In addition to the latter: make sure that you have used just a tiny bit of thermal interface material ('cooling paste') for optimal heat transfer Smile.
_________________
thandor.net - hardware
And the rest of us would be carousing the aisles, stuffing baloney.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
max3



Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 430
Location: DREAM LAND

PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just an addition - i usually clean old dried out thermo compound clear of the heat sink before applying fresh one.

p.s. this seem to be DEll machine, some dell bios-es have some temp. info in the bios along with non dell mobos, see if anything related to that present, that way no additional software needs to be installed.

p.p.s. everest/astra/sisoft sandra/ etc all show temps and such.

_________________
its here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
DellDim5000
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks guys. As to the heat transfer (after having removed any old thermal paste of course) I used arctic silver following exactly the "grain of rice" size application method. But when I checked the paste distribution/contact pattern today, it does not look too good. The heat sink sits on the cpu not much more than maybe half of it's total surface, and unfortunately that affects the important center area (around the core) as well. Whether or not that is the reason for the high rpm remains to be determined, with the old cpu it was not a lot better for sure.

No temp info whatsoever in the bios.

And since this is a P4 lacking a digital thermal sensor, with a proprietary and poorly documented interface of it's embedded controller chip, I have not come across any program able to read out the cpu temp. And I have tested approx. 10 of them so far, including Everest and HWmonitor.

In another forum I read that I can reduce cpu load by adding RAM, is that true?

And again the question, could a defective cpu technically result in high operating temps?
Back to top
Qwerty



Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 3141
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DellDim5000 wrote:
In another forum I read that I can reduce cpu load by adding RAM, is that true?

You will not reduce CPU load by adding more RAM. (Theoretically you can reduce the HDD load.)
Why should it be reduced? Was there any explanation in this forum?

IMHO the best way to reduce the temperature of the CPU is to purchase a new cooler Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
D.8080



Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The cpu you have now is known to operate at high temperatures, in fact it was the whistle for no more cpus over that frequency.
It also sucks up a lot more juice (watts).

It does give an extra 30% over your previous prcessore, but at a cost.
Your heatsink is just at his limit in cooling it, and maybe you should buy a more performing one.

Forget overclocking it. It's already an oven on its own.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Thandor



Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 461

PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DellDim5000 wrote:
The heat sink sits on the cpu not much more than maybe half of it's total surface, and unfortunately that affects the important center area (around the core) as well.
Good chance that this is causing a very hot CPU. Try fiddling around with this and perhaps add some more thermal paste on the spot where the contact is bad.

In practical terms: the 3.8GHz Pentium 4 is quite doable. In my test machine (for benchmarking graphic cards) I use one of the earlier 3.8GHz engineering samples with just the stock cooler. As long as the heatsink has good contact and the system can 'breathe' (due airflow, casefans) it won't be such a problem. The older versions of the 3.6GHz Pentium 4 and the Pentium D 830 ~ 840XE are much warmer and they managed to cool it as well Wink.

_________________
thandor.net - hardware
And the rest of us would be carousing the aisles, stuffing baloney.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
max3



Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 430
Location: DREAM LAND

PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
And since this is a P4 lacking a digital thermal sensor, with a proprietary and poorly documented interface of it's embedded controller chip

- chip itself has FEATURES:
-CPU IDLE STATE
-ENCHANCED SPEED STEP TECHNOLOGY
-THERMAL MONITORING TECHNOLOGY
-TDP 115W

May be i am missing something... but its pretty detailed description of realization and design guide:
http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/designguide/302553.pdf

what i am trying to say is:
All computers have thermal design implemented and the fact that your fan spinning faster, comparing to, when you had older processor, tells me that your board has thermal tracing technologies implemented as well, cpu gets hotter, sensor senses it it sends signal to controller to increase rpms of the cpu fan. Why you are not getting any temperature information in your software i dont know, it has to show something.
Can you do a couple of screenshots of the soft that you are using ?

_________________
its here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry for the late reply, perhaps like other guest users I was accidently temporarily blocked from this forum.

In the meantime I have come to the conclusion that there is nothing wrong with the cpu, but the particular heat sink design of this computer, maybe just this very machine of mine, is unable to dissipate the heat sufficiently that the 3.8 generates, which may have even caused the processor to even throttle down during certain operations. Which would perfectly explain the impression under which I ended up when I eventually went back to the 3.0: this one appears to run smoother, maybe faster, at least not noticeably slower (with all kinds of applications) and brought the fan back to run at an almost constant, low, inaudible speed.

Prior to that I took the 3.8 out and put it back in several times, playing with the heat sink trying to get it to a better contact to the cpu, but in vain. The differences were insignificant, and more thermal paste where there was poor contact seemed to do nothing. Amazingly though, for the 3.0 it appears to be "good enough". I would never have believed the difference between both cpus was so extreme in regards of heat regulation.

And no, I am certainly not going to overclock it. I wouldn't even know how to do his right now.

Cpu load reduction by adding ram, this theory wasn't backed up by any explanation whatsoever.

I may look into better coolers next chance, and maybe give it another shot with the 670. Any suggestions for what might fit into this Dell Dimension desktop?

And as far as cpu temperature information, lately I had tried Hwinfo32, Everest, CPUID, Core Temp and Speedfan (a few more some time ago which I can't remember right now). None of them was able to get the cpu temp, which got me to contact the developers of the above ones asking how come. Well, Core Temp excludes "older" cpus such as the P4 in their faq right away. Hwinfo32, CPUID and speedfan admitted to the problem, said they kept working on it but were basically referring to the issue stated before. No feedback from Everest yet.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern CPUs - upgrades, overclocking and troubleshooting All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group