| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Synaps3 Guest
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:13 pm Post subject: CPU overvoltage question |
|
|
I am overclocking a CPU. I am able to maintain a very consistent temperature using a radiator and compressor as well as a TEC. In order to overclock any more, I have to raise the voltage above what most people say is the "limit" (1.5V). It is an AMD FX-4100.
My question is: Does running a CPU above the specified voltage cause degradation? My guess is no. I would think that once you got to a certain voltage, it would short, and break, but running right below that voltage would not cause degradation, or would it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
running any processor outside it's voltage limits will shorten the life of the processor
by how much.. is dependent on how well the processor is kept cooled
a 5 degree increase at the heat-spreader may mean a 30 degree increase at the core as the heat-spreader can only transfer so much heat
most modern CPUs have thermal trips built it.. but it the area of concern is running the processor just under this for long periods _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html
Last edited by Neon_WA on Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's say the CPU was kept at the perfect temperature at all times. If the CPU was overvoltaged and remained at the same temperature, it would not shorten the life of the processor, right?
So insufficient cooling would shorten the life of the processor, not overvoltage? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes and no.. both are linked.. over-voltage creates more heat
if you can control the heat.. then it shouldn't affect lifespan
just means you will have to clean the heatsink/fan more often to maintain the processor in the preferred temperature range
due to the lag in the heat-spreader transferring the heat.. some people remove the heat-spreader so they can apply heat-sink directly to the core
but damage to the core becomes a lot more likely _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | if you can control the heat.. then it shouldn't affect lifespan
just means you will have to clean the heatsink/fan more often to maintain the processor in the preferred temperature range |
Good. Understand that I am not using a heatsink. I am using a Thermal Electric Cooler (TEC) and a compressor that I can adjust down to -30C if I need to. It is for an experiment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | Good. Understand that I am not using a heatsink. I am using a Thermal Electric Cooler (TEC) and a compressor that I can adjust down to -30C if I need to. It is for an experiment. |
Yes.. was trying to be more general for others that might read the question and want to apply it
also things like lapping the top of the heat-spreader flat makes me laugh.. due to the fact the heat-spreader flatness changes depending on the temperature of the CPU
So that would mean you need to lap it at the operating temperature  _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html
Last edited by Neon_WA on Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks. This is the quickest responding forum I've been on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | Thanks. This is the quickest responding forum I've been on. |
no problems mate
a good analogy is like the diff between standard car & formula 1 car
standard car (stock CPU) will run probably 30,000km if not serviced
while F1 (over clocked / voltage) needs attention on a regular basis even to get to the start line  _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both higher voltage and higher temperature can decrease the life of your processor.
One of the failure modes of integrated circuits involves Electromigration. The empirical Black's equation describes the mean time to failure for a conducting wire, and the failure time depends on temperature and current density. Current density depends on the driving voltage.
Of course, how much the lifetime is decreased is the question. Maybe it goes down from 20 years to 18 years; maybe it is much worse - it depends on how hard you push it, and the characteristics of each individual processor. I don't have experience with failure testing AMD FX processors, so I don't know the numbers.
I talked to a couple of low temp (LN2) overclockers, Kingpin and Sammi Makinen. They observe that when a chip is about to die, it is unable to overclock as high as it previously could, and then eventually it just won't POST at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|