| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pcfans

Joined: 13 Feb 2014 Posts: 492
|
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2014 5:02 am Post subject: TMS 1000 Chip |
|
|
| TMS 1000 JDLC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kaijusears

Joined: 19 Dec 2012 Posts: 127 Location: Huntsville Al. USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Beautiful! I'm fortunate enough to own one too.
This mil-spec chip was the first microprocessor. The 4004 never held that title and never will. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pcfans

Joined: 13 Feb 2014 Posts: 492
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kaijusears wrote: | Beautiful! I'm fortunate enough to own one too.
This mil-spec chip was the first microprocessor. The 4004 never held that title and never will. |
Nope.
Intel 4004 is earlier than TMS 4bit processor. _________________ I'm focus on collection of 70s vintage personal computer now. here's the blog of my collection: www.vintage-computer.net (a lots of fine photos) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wepwawet

Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 3019 Location: Seligenstadt - Germany
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pcfans wrote: | | kaijusears wrote: | Beautiful! I'm fortunate enough to own one too.
This mil-spec chip was the first microprocessor. The 4004 never held that title and never will. |
Nope.
Intel 4004 is earlier than TMS 4bit processor. | i
haha, again the question "what is a microprocessor". thst question will never be finally answered;-/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kaijusears

Joined: 19 Dec 2012 Posts: 127 Location: Huntsville Al. USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It's really not that hard to figure out. Check to see who holds the US patent on the microprocessor. Check the introduction date of the chips. Ask the Smithsonian institution. Just google "first microprocessor" and look at the Wikipedia article. Don't be lazy, read the whole article. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wepwawet

Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 3019 Location: Seligenstadt - Germany
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whatever absolute truth wikipedia stands for - the question is not, which company holds a patent or whose lawyers found a definition their clients suit so they won at court.
Today's CPUs do pretty much nothing without RAM and program, such as a single 4004, AL1 or a 74181.
Most of the currently mainly agreed "first" definitions have an appendix. Such as "commercial".
Btw the AGC (which part of it, which version!?!) stated in the wiki article did not only contain three input nor gates, that just for the full truth.
Which was the first single chip ic being able to perform different tasks only depending on the program it was fed with, while the creator of that IC had no knowledge about these tasks?
(lol, just another attempt to ask the right question and not get the answer 42) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kaijusears

Joined: 19 Dec 2012 Posts: 127 Location: Huntsville Al. USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All good points wepwawet, and whatever they each are called make them both no less important mile-markers in history. They are perhaps both given way more fanfare than they deserve.
As Issac Newton said in 1676 "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|