| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cedrik
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 2008
Location: Rom�nia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 7:29 am Post subject: |
 |
|
As far as I can tell, Q0877 should be in a ceramic package, so I would say it is fake. Also, I don't thing that there was a plastic pentium at that speed.
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cedrik
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 2008
Location: Rom�nia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crusty_dog
Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 103
Location: Australia / Singapore
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This site has it listed as a B1 stepping SPGA, but this is incorrect by my work records.
The Q0877 was a 133MHz C0 stepping PPGA out of Intel's Assembly Technology Development section.
At the same time we were testing boards with Q0878, a 150MHz C0 stepping PPGA.
This was October 1995, so would work in with the week 30 1995 marked on the processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crusty_dog
Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 103
Location: Australia / Singapore
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cedrik
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 2008
Location: Rom�nia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crusty_dog
Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 103
Location: Australia / Singapore
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| from my time in the industry & having dealt with the grey/fake market I have no reason to suspect this is a fake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cedrik
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 2008
Location: Rom�nia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cedrik
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 2008
Location: Rom�nia
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| crusty_dog wrote: |
This was October 1995, so would work in with the week 30 1995 marked on the processor |
Could be the 4595 datecode from ATD ?
_________________
https://www.facebook.com/CPUCollectionRO |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crusty_dog
Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 103
Location: Australia / Singapore
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cedrik wrote: | | Could be the 4595 datecode from ATD ? |
from my notes the number after ATD was more an internal number used by Intel & may not have anything to do with dates |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
