NexGen Nx586 PF100-E/E vs. NexGen Nx586 P100-E/E
Goto page 1, 2  Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Information Requests (Collectible Chips only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 12:06 am    Post subject: NexGen Nx586 PF100-E/E vs. NexGen Nx586 P100-E/E Reply with quote

Is there any difference? Is "P100-E/E" without FPU? Does anyone know?

Nx586 PF100-E/E Nx586-E A-2DCPC-202, 001
Nx586 P100-E/E Nx586-E A-2DCPC-202, 001


_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
crusty_dog



Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 103
Location: Australia / Singapore

PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes the P100 is without a FPU, while the PF100 contains an inbuilt FPU

Nexgen made a FPU (587) to run with the non-FPU processors, but I have only seen development boards made to run both
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, but Iīd I wonder if particulalry this one with brown HS could be also without FPU, nothing about this is on the net.
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
crusty_dog



Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 103
Location: Australia / Singapore

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 3:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seeing the lot/serial number/package is very similar I suspect the P100-E/E either has a disabled FPU or the FPU failed testing

This is the standard package P100

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 5:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are probably right, it make sense. I didnīt know that exists Nexgen with brown HS without FPU. I found only one picture on the net.
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
Marcin



Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://abc-cpu.com/index.php/chip-collection/nexgen/nx586/-1-2698
They are same "common" as version with FPU.

_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tested P110 Nexgen Brown HS and actually it has a FPU. I didnīt expect that. So in these days you could buy Nexgen P110 with silver HS without a FPU and also Nexgen P110 brown HS with FPU, itīs a mess Laughing
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.


Last edited by misace on Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW, the testing board came with Nexgen (big sliver HS) without speed marking and it was switch as P90. I assume no one altered switches on board, so it could be the original speed of speedless Nexgen on picture bellow. I was about to think, the later models has more likely a bit higher speeds...
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
crusty_dog



Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 103
Location: Australia / Singapore

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the info Smile

Question, even with FPU does it benchmark like a 3 legged dog?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
frag_



Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice!
Can you run SuperPi 1M on this P110?
Would be great to see the result on such rare chip!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SuperPi 1.1e:
Nexgen Nx586 Brown HS with FPU @P100 @93MHz
(W95,16M RAM,Defaults,Nexgen PCI mobo L2 256kB)............................... 0h 30m 37s
AMD K6-2+ @200MHz (XP,144M RAM, 0kB L3,defaults, Toshiba 1620CDS). 0h 12m 14s
Nexgen Nx586 Silver HS No FPU @P100 @93MHz currently running ........ ~15h estimated from 1st loop

Super PI 1.9 WP
AMD K6-2+ @200MHz (XP,144M RAM, 0kB L3,defaults, Toshiba 1620CDS). 0h 11m 49s
AMD K6-2+ @400MHz (XP,144M RAM, 0kB L3,defaults, Toshiba 1620CDS). 0h 07m 37s

I tried to run both SuperPi 1.1e & Super PI 1.9 WP(latest) on modern HW and results are comparable. 14s & 15s on Hasswel Pentium 2,6 and 15s & 16s on Core i5 laptop.

I will use this post as my notepad.

_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.


Last edited by misace on Wed Aug 10, 2016 3:10 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
frag_



Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting, thanks!
>(W95,16M RAM,Defaults,Nexgen PCI mobo L2 256kB)............................... 0h 30m 14s
Screenshot has a bit slower time, different settings?

Significantly faster than i486DX4-100 (~50 min at default speed).
Slower than Pentium (under 20 min at 100 MHz) and K5 (about 25 min).
Last two has twice faster bus though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

frag_ wrote:
Interesting, thanks!
>(W95,16M RAM,Defaults,Nexgen PCI mobo L2 256kB)............................... 0h 30m 14s
Screenshot has a bit slower time, different settings?

Significantly faster than i486DX4-100 (~50 min at default speed).
Slower than Pentium (under 20 min at 100 MHz) and K5 (about 25 min).
Last two has twice faster bus though.


Sorry, my mistake, I ran it only once, so screenshot is right. I donīt understand how CPUs work, so my question may be stupid. Result are quite good, so Nx587 is connected to L1 cache directly? Or FPU doesnīt need L1 cache to perform competitively? Iīd like to know how Nx586 and Nx587 are connected in MCM module.

_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
misace



Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

*results for K5, Pentium and 6x86 taken from feipoaīs Ultimate 686 Benchmark.
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.


Last edited by misace on Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:17 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
frag_



Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

misace wrote:
Result are quite good, so Nx587 is connected to L1 cache directly? Or FPU doesnīt need L1 cache to perform competitively?

Yes, FPU uses both L1 and L2 caches, check page 43:
http://datasheets.chipdb.org/NexGen/2_Hardware%20Architecture.pdf

misace wrote:
Iīd like to know how Nx586 and Nx587 are connected in MCM module.

http://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=106595#106595
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Information Requests (Collectible Chips only) All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group