| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 12:06 am Post subject: NexGen Nx586 PF100-E/E vs. NexGen Nx586 P100-E/E |
|
|
Is there any difference? Is "P100-E/E" without FPU? Does anyone know?
Nx586 PF100-E/E Nx586-E A-2DCPC-202, 001
Nx586 P100-E/E Nx586-E A-2DCPC-202, 001
  _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crusty_dog

Joined: 03 Apr 2015 Posts: 103 Location: Australia / Singapore
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes the P100 is without a FPU, while the PF100 contains an inbuilt FPU
Nexgen made a FPU (587) to run with the non-FPU processors, but I have only seen development boards made to run both |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, but Iīd I wonder if particulalry this one with brown HS could be also without FPU, nothing about this is on the net. _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crusty_dog

Joined: 03 Apr 2015 Posts: 103 Location: Australia / Singapore
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seeing the lot/serial number/package is very similar I suspect the P100-E/E either has a disabled FPU or the FPU failed testing
This is the standard package P100
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are probably right, it make sense. I didnīt know that exists Nexgen with brown HS without FPU. I found only one picture on the net. _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tested P110 Nexgen Brown HS and actually it has a FPU. I didnīt expect that. So in these days you could buy Nexgen P110 with silver HS without a FPU and also Nexgen P110 brown HS with FPU, itīs a mess  _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Last edited by misace on Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BTW, the testing board came with Nexgen (big sliver HS) without speed marking and it was switch as P90. I assume no one altered switches on board, so it could be the original speed of speedless Nexgen on picture bellow. I was about to think, the later models has more likely a bit higher speeds... _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crusty_dog

Joined: 03 Apr 2015 Posts: 103 Location: Australia / Singapore
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the info
Question, even with FPU does it benchmark like a 3 legged dog? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 4015 Location: Estonia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice!
Can you run SuperPi 1M on this P110?
Would be great to see the result on such rare chip! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
SuperPi 1.1e:
Nexgen Nx586 Brown HS with FPU @P100 @93MHz
(W95,16M RAM,Defaults,Nexgen PCI mobo L2 256kB)............................... 0h 30m 37s
AMD K6-2+ @200MHz (XP,144M RAM, 0kB L3,defaults, Toshiba 1620CDS). 0h 12m 14s
Nexgen Nx586 Silver HS No FPU @P100 @93MHz currently running ........ ~15h estimated from 1st loop
Super PI 1.9 WP
AMD K6-2+ @200MHz (XP,144M RAM, 0kB L3,defaults, Toshiba 1620CDS). 0h 11m 49s
AMD K6-2+ @400MHz (XP,144M RAM, 0kB L3,defaults, Toshiba 1620CDS). 0h 07m 37s
I tried to run both SuperPi 1.1e & Super PI 1.9 WP(latest) on modern HW and results are comparable. 14s & 15s on Hasswel Pentium 2,6 and 15s & 16s on Core i5 laptop.
I will use this post as my notepad. _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Last edited by misace on Wed Aug 10, 2016 3:10 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 4015 Location: Estonia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting, thanks!
>(W95,16M RAM,Defaults,Nexgen PCI mobo L2 256kB)............................... 0h 30m 14s
Screenshot has a bit slower time, different settings?
Significantly faster than i486DX4-100 (~50 min at default speed).
Slower than Pentium (under 20 min at 100 MHz) and K5 (about 25 min).
Last two has twice faster bus though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| frag_ wrote: | Interesting, thanks!
>(W95,16M RAM,Defaults,Nexgen PCI mobo L2 256kB)............................... 0h 30m 14s
Screenshot has a bit slower time, different settings?
Significantly faster than i486DX4-100 (~50 min at default speed).
Slower than Pentium (under 20 min at 100 MHz) and K5 (about 25 min).
Last two has twice faster bus though. |
Sorry, my mistake, I ran it only once, so screenshot is right. I donīt understand how CPUs work, so my question may be stupid. Result are quite good, so Nx587 is connected to L1 cache directly? Or FPU doesnīt need L1 cache to perform competitively? Iīd like to know how Nx586 and Nx587 are connected in MCM module. _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
misace

Joined: 14 Sep 2012 Posts: 932 Location: Prague, Czechia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*results for K5, Pentium and 6x86 taken from feipoaīs Ultimate 686 Benchmark. _________________ Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES.
Last edited by misace on Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:17 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 4015 Location: Estonia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|