| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
1111
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:21 am Post subject: 1950X has processing language - 3DNow !, 3DNow!+ ? |
 |
|
this Threadripper 1920X & 1950X has processing language - 3DNow !, 3DNow!+
??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No support for 3DNow! since Bulldoser. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1111
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 5:47 am Post subject: Bulldoser Also does not support |
|
|
thanks
So what do programs are built on 3DNow !, 3DNow!+
??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| They will not work throwing Invalid Opcode exception. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| frag_ wrote: | | They will not work throwing Invalid Opcode exception. |
what can do if i need New processor with 3DNow !, 3DNow!+ ?
AMD Ryzen Threadripper ?
Intel 7820 ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are no new processors with 3DNow!
If you really need this instruction set then the best should be Phenom II.
Now I am curious, why do you need 3DNow! with fast CPU, games?
But all games that used it is 15+ years old and no not need anything faster than Athlon XP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| frag_ wrote: | There are no new processors with 3DNow!
If you really need this instruction set then the best should be Phenom II.
Now I am curious, why do you need 3DNow! with fast CPU, games?
But all games that used it is 15+ years old and no not need anything faster than Athlon XP. |
-
It's not for game.
It's a special video player - real-time converter to:
1. upscale Quality processor that consumes a lot of processors .
2. Converts 24FPS to 75 FPS and it also requires huge power of processors
3. the software also shortens the response time of the LED screen
4. number of CPU cores as much as possible, so it's better
5. Player written to 3DNow+ commands! and 3DNow!
all other commands do not give the picture / sound quality that gives
3DNow+ commands! and 3DNow! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
roni
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2017 5:05 am Post subject: why AMD does not find a processor for movies and graphics |
|
|
why AMD does not find a processor for movies and graphics with 3DNOW?
a good idea |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}