| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marcin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cuttingedgecs
Joined: 08 Oct 2017
Posts: 1764
Location: Australia
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 5:28 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| He does list the processor as damaged... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marcin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cuttingedgecs wrote: | | He does list the processor as damaged... |
In description :"untested, I sell it as damaged"
_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
feipoa
Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Posts: 553
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Intriguing. Will this work in a 440BX board? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
misace
Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like "What will happen" challenge 
There´s mine:
1) No post
2) Burn out
3) Boot it
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If there were any slot 1 motherboards that didn't use an Intel chipset, that is what I would test. Perhaps a SiS chipset? My guess is that nothing will happen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TASOS
Joined: 15 Oct 2016
Posts: 168
Location: Athens Greece
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:20 am Post subject: Re: AMD K6 in Socket 370 adapter ? |
|
|
My bet is on 1st option.
Dont test it.
Completely different pinout
https://flylib.com/books/en/4.57.1.22/1/
That seller did "magic" to fit that cpu on that adapter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marcin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:17 am Post subject: Re: AMD K6 in Socket 370 adapter ? |
|
|
| feipoa wrote: | | Intriguing. Will this work in a 440BX board? |
Hmmm on 440EX AT board almost fit ... almost
| TASOS wrote: | | ... Dont test it. |
I'm not even able to do this ... I'm not the "lucky" winner 
| TASOS wrote: | | That seller did "magic" to fit that cpu on that adapter. |
I'm thinking of his inspiration too ...
| misace wrote: |
There´s mine:
1) No post
2) Burn out
3) Boot it |
In that case I would bet for 2) with little sparkles
_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KK_Fin
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Posts: 835
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 6:43 am Post subject: Re: AMD K6 in Socket 370 adapter ? |
|
|
| Marcin wrote: |
I'm thinking of his inspiration too ...
|
Someone took too seriously my avatar (and improved it by changing Pentium to K6-2)? 
EDIT: I used that (broken) adapter in cleaning CPUs and drilling one hole, it can be used with socket 7 CPUs also. It helps protecting pins when cleaning top surface.
_________________
1242 x86 CPUs in my collection (week 2 2026). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marcin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 8519
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 8:03 am Post subject: Re: AMD K6 in Socket 370 adapter ? |
|
|
| KK_Fin wrote: | | ...I used that (broken) adapter in cleaning CPUs and drilling one hole, it can be used with socket 7 CPUs also. It helps protecting pins when cleaning top surface. |
Nice patent I will keep one PPGA to Slot 1 adapter for same purpose + testing straight of pins.
_________________
Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alvaro84
Joined: 17 Apr 2015
Posts: 80
Location: Fehérvárcsurgó, Hungary
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| misace wrote: | I like "What will happen" challenge
There´s mine:
1) No post
2) Burn out
3) Boot it |
If you ask about the VIA C7 in the Asus CT-479, then it't a definite 3. I've tested a C7-M 754 (Esther core) in an Asus P4C800, it did even boot WinXP and run CPU-Z and other things. It was very slow for a P4C800 based system, though.
But I admit that I was quite hesitant to try it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
misace
Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| alvaro84 wrote: |
If you ask about the VIA C7 in the Asus CT-479, then it't a definite 3. I've tested a C7-M 754 (Esther core) in an Asus P4C800, it did even boot WinXP and run CPU-Z and other things. It was very slow for a P4C800 based system, though.
But I admit that I was quite hesitant to try it |
Oh really?  I´m testing it right now on Asus P4GPL-X, it doesn´t post, even not a single beep.  At least it doesn´t damage adapter or board.
It´s a incredible find that VIA´s V4 bus is the same as Intel´s Quad Pumped Bus. Intel now can sue VIA for stolen technology.
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
misace
Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 932
Location: Prague, Czechia
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh nice, thanks. So I will start to look after Asus P4C800 or some ITX board with Asus P4C800 and 479 socket.
_________________
Looking For Chips 386 J38605DX, Symphony FPU, Rise Tiger, MP6-II, Winchip 3&4, IDT C6-Early Logo, Nx686, Tesla 8088, L80C86, Bulgarian 8088, Pentium 4 QT69ES. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alvaro84
Joined: 17 Apr 2015
Posts: 80
Location: Fehérvárcsurgó, Hungary
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| misace wrote: | | Oh nice, thanks. So I will start to look after Asus P4C800 or some ITX board with Asus P4C800 and 479 socket. |
I think some P4P800 variants will suffice too, it only needs to support the CT-479 adapter.
According to this link quite a few Asus boards have the BIOS support (it probably needs to be upgraded but Asus does still have the BIOS' online):
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/CT-479/
P4P800 SE, P4P800-VM, P4P800-E, P4C800-E, P4GD1, P4GPL-X
I've tried it (the adapter, not that particular C7 CPU) with P4P800-E, P4P800-VM, P4C800, P4C800-E. Surely the P4C800 line was the best among them because it supports both FSB and multiplier settings in it BIOS setup. The P4P800-E won't let you change the multiplier but you're free to set any FSB you wand (and the CPU can take). The P4P800-VM was an oddball, IIRC it let me set a different multiplier but I couldn't touch the FSB...
I hope I helped to broaden your scope of search |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
