| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | it would be nice to test the processors with an iComp of 810 to see if anything could be learnt from it  |
just bumping this thread... anyone tested there icomp 810 P100 yet? _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC

Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3469
|
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hugo929

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 6163 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
this still remain a mystery
what is the difference between 810 and 815
which is fake and which is genuine. _________________ My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hugo929 wrote: | this still remain a mystery
what is the difference between 810 and 815
which is fake and which is genuine. |
until someone wants to test theirs.. it will stay a mystery _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xaar

Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Posts: 319 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, according to the Intel Pentium Processor Specification Update (release number 041, January 1999, page 15), the Pentium 100 has an ICOMP of 815.
So maybe it is a production fault? _________________ Sorry for my bad English - I'm working on it!
My tradelist ( Updated 2013-12-20 ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hugo929

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 6163 Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can confirm 99% that iComp 810 SX962s are genuine and that they are not random as it appears.
Still collecting a bit more info to back my statement up, but will retease the info soon. _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JAC

Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3469
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you confirm at 99%, what do you do at 100%? Throw a party? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gold Top 100s made in the USA (sorted by test date)
C440073W-0490 SX960 815 441
C4420698-1211 SX960 815 442
C442098W-0110 SX960 815 444
C4470800-0400 SX960 815 446
C449088W-1319 SX962 810 450
C4490896-0332 SX962 810 450
C4490896-0399 SX962 810 450
C4500785-1045 SX962 810 450
C4500785-1238 SX962 810 450
C449089W-0402 SX962 815 451
C449103W-0489 SX962 815 451
C451117W-0376 SX962 815 451
C451117W-0907 SX962 815 451
C4520744-0232 SX962 815 452
C4520747-0245 SX962 815 453
Gold Top 100s made in Malay (sorted by test date)
L4372767-0013 SX886 815 438
L4403068-0159 SX956 815 440
L4403068-0300 SX956 815 443
L4461789-1748 SX960 815 446
L4461789-1788 SX960 815 446
L4463147-1236 SX960 815 446
L4463149-1197 SX960 815 447
L4483741-0634 SX962 815 449
L4473191-0413 SX962 810 450
L4492561-2450 SX962 810 450
L4501983-0919 SX962 810 450
L4502015-0649 SX962 810 450
L4502210-0299 SX962 810 451
L4510632-0152 SX962 810 451
L4510632-0180 SX962 810 451
L4512547-0372 SX962 815 453
L5012710-1117 SX962 815 502
Gold Top 100s from both plants combined (sorted by test date)
C440073W-0490 SX960 815 441
C4420698-1211 SX960 815 442
L4403068-0300 SX956 815 443
C442098W-0110 SX960 815 444
L4461789-1748 SX960 815 446
L4461789-1788 SX960 815 446
L4463147-1236 SX960 815 446
C4470800-0400 SX960 815 446
L4463149-1197 SX960 815 447
L4483741-0634 SX962 815 449
L4473191-0413 SX962 810 450
C449088W-1319 SX962 810 450
C4490896-0332 SX962 810 450
C4490896-0399 SX962 810 450
L4492561-2450 SX962 810 450
C4500785-1045 SX962 810 450
C4500785-1238 SX962 810 450
L4501983-0919 SX962 810 450
L4502015-0649 SX962 810 450
L4502210-0299 SX962 810 451
L4510632-0152 SX962 810 451
L4510632-0180 SX962 810 451
C449089W-0402 SX962 815 451
C449103W-0489 SX962 815 451
C451117W-0376 SX962 815 451
C451117W-0907 SX962 815 451
C4520744-0232 SX962 815 452
L4512547-0372 SX962 815 453
C4520747-0245 SX962 815 453
C449103W-0222 SX962 815 502
L5012710-1117 SX962 815 502
as the engraved markings were not done till after testing was done and sorting by test date shows that icomp 810 wasn't random.
but it will still not tell us why Intel changed icomp and then back again to the original value
still missing the die marking information on some chips, but this is a work in progress and additional info will be added _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html
Last edited by Neon_WA on Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnorun

Joined: 04 Apr 2008 Posts: 3364 Location: Chicago, IL- US
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Amazing amount of research, Stu!
How do you make the time?? Do you have a direct pipeline to Intel HQ archives?  _________________ My collection list (growing) http://johnorun.x86-guide.com/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Reviving this subject, as I just found that my goldtop SX926 was iComp 810. C449088W-0197
Wonder if they had production problems, adding some latency in L1 cache, to be able to run at 100 MHz. On the contrary, it would be strange that it would affect all locations, then, unless the dies are all made the same place and the factory mentioned is the place of assembly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|