| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
alexino2
Joined: 13 Mar 2017 Posts: 355 Location: France
|
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 1:15 pm Post subject: Intel D8080 |
|
|
Hello everyone,
The question of the D8080 being a misprint D8080A or not will finaly be answered. Because i'm crazy, i just opened it :
I've been pretty lucky not braking it ! I even manage to take a picture of the copyright with the microscope, and here the result :
It looks similar to this one here :
https://en.wikichip.org/w/images/3/32/8080_die_shot.png
The question now is from which cpu was taken that last die ? Does anyone has a D8080A die to compare ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alexino2
Joined: 13 Mar 2017 Posts: 355 Location: France
|
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just opened my D8080A pre-FPO from 1978
I confirm, the D8080 is just a D8080A from 1976-79.
I'm so disapointed, thought could be a real 8080 or even a C8080A die from 1974 :'( |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haha would be cool to see a 8080 non A die
The documentation from 1975ish still referred to the 8080A as the 8080, they weren't super concerned about making a distinction, guess the die markings were the same lack of concern _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjluna2
Joined: 27 Oct 2014 Posts: 1302 Location: Hiram, GA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it has to do with the change of the NMOS process between 1974 and 1977 to HMOS process. I'm trying to figure this out. I'll post the next issue of Intel Preview that discuss about their semiconductor process and we can discuss this from there.
Here is later information that I have gleaned at the second picture in this forum: http://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=214612#214612 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good job. Now we know.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yann
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 47 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yann.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xsecret

Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 1847 Location: France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alexino2
Joined: 13 Mar 2017 Posts: 355 Location: France
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rjluna2 wrote: | | I think it has to do with the change of the NMOS process between 1974 and 1977 to HMOS process. I'm trying to figure this out. I'll post the next issue of Intel Preview that discuss about their semiconductor process and we can discuss this from there. |
This would be mean the C8080A was already HMOS ? Or they didn't differentiate Nmos from Hmos on their packaging ?
The strangest thing in all is that this D8080 was made in 1983 and should have a 1979 die (instead of 1976). Thing we would have never find out without opening. If someone has a damage D8080A from middle 80's ready to open, this could solve the mistery once it for all.
Was the 8080A compatible with a 8080 system ? According to these improvement : |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjluna2
Joined: 27 Oct 2014 Posts: 1302 Location: Hiram, GA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks more likely a minor mask changes not enough to update the mask information
That would line up with the revision on NMOS process in stages
We need to dig up different version of 8080 datasheet to differentiate one to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjluna2
Joined: 27 Oct 2014 Posts: 1302 Location: Hiram, GA, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|