| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
crazybubba64

Joined: 03 Jul 2018 Posts: 1371 Location: WI, USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 2:27 pm Post subject: Intel SoMa Discussion |
|
|
Since these chips have been fairly popular and mysterious, I figure we should have a place to discuss them.
For those uninformed of these parts, they have been cropping up online in very very large quantities lately. It is estimated that at least 100,000 of the chips exist based off of a picture of one of the seller's stacks of boxes containing them. It is unlikely that these are simple mechanical or thermal samples, yet evidence of a working system has yet to surface (as of the time of writing)
There are two known flavors of these: SoMa and SoMa-B3.
The s-spec printed on their bulk packaging is SR26U.
The IPN of these is CMLIVADIA, which seems to be a codename. (Named after a city in Crimea?)
None of these chips show the Intel logo or copyright text, yet they were sent in for e4 RoHS compliance.
These chips are all dated late 2014 based off of lot codes and packing dates.
They use a similar pin arrangement to LGA1156, but do not have any SMT components on the bottom or under the IHS.
Anyone have an idea what these are supposed to be?
I have a crackpot theory that seems to line up with the dates of the chips.
In 2015, the U.S. Government forbade Intel from selling Xeon Phi CPU's to China for their supercomputers.
I think these were special one-off CPUs for a cancelled supercomputer collaboration. Maybe they were using cores similar to other Xeon Phi chips on a smaller scale? _________________ My collection |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cvandijk
Joined: 21 Jul 2016 Posts: 3589 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 22, 2019 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I reed somewhere that some people think that they are atom cores? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xsecret

Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 1846 Location: France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34258 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xsecret wrote: | Where is the picture about the "seller's stacks of boxes containing them" ?
For sure, we need a die shot to be sure, but I expect only a resistor array. No decoupling caps = no transistors. |
Indeed, or something simple, I don't think these are thermal samples, I think they are most likely a mechanical sample, not for others to use so much as for Intel to figure out how to make a multi die LGA package. So basically a manufacturing test, can we put 4 dies on a package and keep the assembly yields high enough, thus making a fair number of them to have a decent sample size _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xsecret

Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 1846 Location: France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
max1024

Joined: 15 Jan 2015 Posts: 636 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is not a SoMa LOL, it is future intel i9-11990K Look like modern AMD Ryzen =) 4 chiplets )) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crazybubba64

Joined: 03 Jul 2018 Posts: 1371 Location: WI, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xsecret wrote: | | Where is the picture about the "seller's stacks of boxes containing them" ? |
Got the pictures _________________ My collection |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjluna2
Joined: 27 Oct 2014 Posts: 1302 Location: Hiram, GA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm waiting impatiently for someone with the right equipment to post die shots to help identify them. _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He has hijacked Intel transport or what ?
This quantity disclaims any kind of sample in my opinion. _________________ Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34258 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Marcin wrote: | He has hijacked Intel transport or what ?
This quantity disclaims any kind of sample in my opinion. |
yah thats a LOT, but whatever it is, must have had problems, or they wouldnt be sitting in someones back room lol _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll LMAO if they turn out to be elaborate and ambitious fakes  _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
svmlegacy

Joined: 15 Jun 2016 Posts: 551 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just throwing this out there as the thought just occurred to me, what if they are in fact atom chips (Potentially Silvermont/Airmont) MCP's, part of a cancelled order due to the high failure rate in high load conditions for this architecture? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvermont#Erratum Either that, or a test bed for this erratum that didn't require full core functionality (potentially not needing the SMD's), but many examples for statistical significance of failure modes?
Either way, I'd like to get my hands on one, and I'll be very excited to see die shots come up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
max1024

Joined: 15 Jan 2015 Posts: 636 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking at these photos, I do not think that this is a finished product that can work.
https://imgur.com/a/Ea4x0bJ
Not a single capacitor. Strange.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| max1024 wrote: | | Looking at these photos, I do not think that this is a finished product that can work. |
That is why I wonder if they could be an elaborate fake. It is rather strange for an sSpec on a non working chip, and more so for there to be so many in one place if they were never intended to be functional. _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|