Intel Solutions Publication
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 20, 21, 22  Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Die photography, wafers and memorabilia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is the section from Microcomputer Component section from Intel Corporation, "Microcomputer Component: New industrial grade product line answers the demand for high-reliability components to operate in industrial applications.", Intel Preview, March/April 1979, Pg. 11
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a page from Intel Corporation, "Military Products: Intel marches on!", Intel Preview, March/April 1979, Pg. 19:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2019 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is an interesting article that the Intel discontinued making 1103 probably due to ever expanding memory in the die that are economically not feasible to make 4K or 8K of RAM that covers more than half of real estate space of the board.

Does anyone has the newest Intel 1103 chip on their hands?

Source: Intel Corporation, "The 1103 retires!", Intel Preview, March/April 1979, page 23.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Intel Corporation, "Memory Components", Intel Preview, May/June 1979, Pg 1.

You can see early wafer size they used in the cover page of this issue only 51 mm (2-inch) diameter for semiconductor fabrication here. In this issue, they were discussing the new technology on their fabrication process called HMOS II. They did not mentioned about the smallest feature in size, instead they talked about the speed and fabrication process. Yes, there are some confusion between the original series and the A-suffix series as they used in between these process. My guess their H-suffix is based on their wording on 'High Speed' in access timing cycles. In this article, they discussed about these memory products for their new technology process.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is an article about Intel 8089 I/O processor announcement at this Preview publication.

Source: Intel Corporation, "Microcomputer Components: Intel Introduces the 8089 IOP, an I/O processor for the advanced 8088/8086 CPU family, the first of a series of new subsystem components", Intel Preview, May/June 1979, Pg 7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here the information on Intel's 8237 5 MHz DMA controller that can handle up to 1.6 megabyte per second in 64KB chuck. This is the forerunner of the original IBM PC chipset.

Source: Intel Corporation, "Microcomputer Components: New Intel 8237 DMA Controller provides a 5 MHz DMA answer for 8088 and 8085A-2 based systems", Intel Preview, May/June 1979, Pg 9.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Borris70



Joined: 24 Apr 2003
Posts: 988
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for sharing the scans - it's an interesting look in the past
_________________
best regards borris

+++++++++++++++++
++ cpu-sammlung.de ++
+++++++++++++++++
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are welcome, Borris70 Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2020 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Curiously, the price seems to be more expensive for lower clock version here Confused

Source: Intel Corporation, "Microcomputer Components: New price reductions and production improvements make the popular 8086 microprocessor even more attractive", Intel Preview, May/June 1979, Pg 11.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2020 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is the price reduction on the DRAM controller.

Source: Intel Corporation, "Microcomputer Components: Intel reduces prices on the 8202, the first single chip, complete solution to dynamic RAM control", Intel Preview, May/June 1979, Pg 11.


Last edited by rjluna2 on Sat Jun 06, 2020 1:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is Intel 8089 price announcement on the inside last page of this magazine.

Source: Intel Corporation, "8089 Price Announcement", Intel Preview, July/August 1979, Page 25.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
CPUShack



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

8089 Was more money then a 8088 (arguably it was more complex, as it contained a CPU AND the IO stuff)
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!

Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indeed it did. The 8089 has its own OP codes instructions there. That's why it fell out in favor of using DMA controller instead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2020 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Intel completed available chipset to support IEEE 448-1978 GPIB communication standards featuring the Intel 8293 Bi-Directional Bus Transceiver.

Source: Intel Corporation, "Feature: 8293 Transceiver completes Intel GPIB family", Intel Preview, January/February 1980, Page 13.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
rjluna2



Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Posts: 1302
Location: Hiram, GA, USA

PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2020 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Intel introduces the faster 8086 processor up to 8 MHz clock rate using the new HMOS II process technology. Curiously, they say that this new process in 4-micrometre channel. Is it really 3.2-micrometre process as the other sources tell us? Confused

In related to our http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/8086/Intel-D8086-2.html and http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/8086/Intel-P8086-2.html we should have oldest commercially available as January 1980 instead of 8-Jun-78. Does anybody have the oldest 8086-2 CPU out in the wild?

Source: Intel Corporation, "New Products: Faster 8086 provides 60% more performance", Intel Preview, January/February 1980, Pg. 22
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Die photography, wafers and memorabilia All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 20, 21, 22  Next
Page 2 of 22
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group