| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Do you have Intel SX944 in your collection? |
| Yes |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| No |
|
95% |
[ 20 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 21 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jedi08
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 463
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:34 pm Post subject: Intel SX944 rarity |
 |
|
| How rare is the SX944 sSpec? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neology
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 2412
Location: VIC, AU
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CHips
Joined: 01 May 2016
Posts: 834
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you find only Wtb lists when looking for an Sspec here then it means that it is really rare Lol
Looks like these are among the Sspecs you wonder if they actually exist...
Also,
| Quote: | | This part can only be used as a dual processor. |
Interesting, why would Intel do this?
Are there other examples of such Cpus?
_________________
Stelo.xyz Museum (CPU Collection and more) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neology
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 2412
Location: VIC, AU
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CHips wrote: | If you find only Wtb lists when looking for an Sspec here then it means that it is really rare Lol
Looks like these are among the Sspecs you wonder if they actually exist...
Also,
| Quote: | | This part can only be used as a dual processor. |
Interesting, why would Intel do this?
Are there other examples of such Cpus? |
| Quote: | | This part can only be used as a dual processor. |
Where do you find this description?
_________________
Want List
Trade List(Up-to-date) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
g0b
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 1385
Location: France
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neology wrote: | | CHips wrote: | If you find only Wtb lists when looking for an Sspec here then it means that it is really rare Lol
Looks like these are among the Sspecs you wonder if they actually exist...
Also,
| Quote: | | This part can only be used as a dual processor. |
Interesting, why would Intel do this?
Are there other examples of such Cpus? |
| Quote: | | This part can only be used as a dual processor. |
Where do you find this description? |
http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SX/SX944.html
_________________
Life is a long lesson in humility |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neology
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 2412
Location: VIC, AU
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| g0b wrote: | | Neology wrote: | | CHips wrote: | If you find only Wtb lists when looking for an Sspec here then it means that it is really rare Lol
Looks like these are among the Sspecs you wonder if they actually exist...
Also,
| Quote: | | This part can only be used as a dual processor. |
Interesting, why would Intel do this?
Are there other examples of such Cpus? |
| Quote: | | This part can only be used as a dual processor. |
Where do you find this description? |
http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SX/SX944.html
|
Thanks g0b.
This is very interesting and now I am wondering where is this originated from? Probably Intel sales catalog or datasheet?
I also wondering if anyone have even seen SX942 and SX943, or have one in their collection? 
_________________
Want List
Trade List(Up-to-date) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Genna only adds specs from official documents or when photos are posted in the new sSpec thread, so it would seem this was in an official doc or on the Intel website.
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neology
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 2412
Location: VIC, AU
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| debs3759 wrote: | | Genna only adds specs from official documents or when photos are posted in the new sSpec thread, so it would seem this was in an official doc or on the Intel website. |
Thanks, Debs
_________________
Want List
Trade List(Up-to-date) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Dual processor only ones were interesting, this was before SMP so for a Dual system there was a primary and a secondary processor. The Primary processor maintained control of the system, some parts could do it, some not, the secondary did not have to have support for this, as it only new about itself in essence. This is why in a Dual Pentium system you cannot use dual overdrives but you can use a normal CPU as the primary, and a overdrive as the secondary, as Overdrives support for being the primary was removed
This info later got added to the back of CPUs
VMU SSS etc
More info:
1. V - Voltage settings
a. S - Standard voltage
b. V - VRE voltage
2. M - Timings
a. M - Minimum valid MD timings
b. S - Minimum valid standard timings
3. U - Dual processor capability
a. U - Untested for dual processors, but tested for UP and MP
b. S - Tested for DP, UP, and MP
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jedi08
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 463
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2020 1:12 pm Post subject: It exists ;-) |
|
|
| Here we are: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neology
Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 2412
Location: VIC, AU
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
