Fake KU80486SX-33 SX684 (tested and verified)

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern Chips (Collectible Chips only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
debs3759



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom

PostPosted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:10 pm    Post subject: Fake KU80486SX-33 SX684 (tested and verified) Reply with quote

I've tested the bulk of my 486 and about 2/3 of my Socket 7 chips. The only oddity I found (odd because I wasn't expecting it...) is that one of my SX684 is a fake.





The top one has a reset ID of 0422, stepping B0. The bottom one has an ID of 0428, stepping cB0. As SX683 has an ID of 0428, and the only other source I have looked at with stepping info shows it should be 0428, the 0422 must be fake. I'm not really surew what the point was for making a fake QFP chip on a PGA adapter - surely whoever did it could have profited more by faking a PGA chip!

This is why I like to keep different examples of a chip that look different, until such time as I can determine whether they are or not Smile

_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.

I can resist anything except temptation.

Debs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
debs3759



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom

PostPosted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SX683 is a 486DX25 in the same package. In this case, it is evident that one or the other is a fake, as the same sSpec will always have the same CPUID value. As Intel used consecutive Spec numbers in many cases to i9ndicate the same core running at a different speed, and as the SX683 I ahve tested has ID 0428, it makes sense to initially assume that is correct.

I then refered to a list I have mirrored locally (I can't remember the original link, unfortuantely, as I would like to contact the author, David L. Beem, about it...), and the 0428 was confirmed by his list.

Also, the one I believe (and state) to be fake has print that is quite heavily raised from the surface of the chip, whereas the other has the regular, flat print.

_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.

I can resist anything except temptation.

Debs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern Chips (Collectible Chips only) All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group