| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gazsharpe101 Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:14 am Post subject: Pentium M - P4 equivalent |
|
|
Hi, I have been told that a Pentium M 1.73Ghz for my laptop is equiavalent to a Desktop Pentium 4 2.6Ghz, does anyone know if this is correct?
Thank You.
Gareth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, its average performance will be about the same.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wizzard1

Joined: 05 Nov 2006 Posts: 930 Location: Boston MA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, different architecture different performance. Thats why a 6GHz Celeron-D around the same as a 5GHz P-D 805 about the same as 4Ghz Athlon 64x2 about the same as a 3GHz C2D.
Also, trivia, I believe that the P3 architecture carried over to the Pentium Mobile, and then evolved into the Core technology. The p4 series was dropped, very low performance for it's high power use and clock speed.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.8080

Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 1474 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
When you see a PIII outperform a P4 at same clock speed, there gotta be some problem in the architecture... even if we speak about pipelines where is the innovation?
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/235
I had a P4 these days for repair, it performs almost same as my block heater though so I could shut down the resistance heater!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pentium-M and Core2 are PIII architecture, wrapped in a P4 wrapper (for P4 bus interfacing)
Intels P4 architecture was a complete failure, thus the need to revert back to the PIII _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wizzard1

Joined: 05 Nov 2006 Posts: 930 Location: Boston MA USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a p3 which outperforms a p4, I call it Tualatin OUtperforms a p4 at a similar clock speed, up to 1.5GHz for the p3/1.4GHz.
Quad pumped bus is great, dont get me wrong, but everything else about Netburst....Yeah.... I'm gonna look the other way now that Core is taking over
It all started with i740 and Rambus..... They tried too hard! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|