| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Do you have one in your collection? |
| yes |
|
25% |
[ 2 ] |
| no |
|
75% |
[ 6 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:28 pm Post subject: K6 233 ANR small misprint |
|
|
Two pictures to make it easier to find it
I did know that it exist, but it took some time to find one.
Christian
Last edited by Jedi08 on Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:55 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting find
Of course, the big question: is it the "ANR" or the "3.3V" that's wrong? _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chiefish

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 2153 Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe the stamp in the bottom left hand corner thats missing in pic 2 ? _________________ "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chiefish wrote: | | Maybe the stamp in the bottom left hand corner thats missing in pic 2 ? |
The speed matrix wasn't on all K6.
ANR had (have) a 3.2V core, which is why I wondered which was the misprint - 3.3V would be APR, as shown on the second image. The cynic in me says it must be a fake, but that's only because if it's not I'm jealous  _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unzlbunzl

Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 468 Location: Graz, Austria
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i was waitung for one of these to turn up
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/1851
Incorrectly labeled AMD K6-233 circulate
A small batch of K6 processors with a clock rate of 233 MHz AMD labeled incorrectly, according to its own data. The processorshave misleading markings "Vcore Vi = 3.3 volts / o = 3.3 volts. In fact is that the CPUs are chips with a core voltage of 3.2 volts. The incorrectly labeled processors are have the identifier "ANR". Chips, which actually need a core voltage of 3.3 volts should have "APR". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thank you Unzlbunzl . I know I read it somewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cpuswe

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 2214 Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have added the chip with the additional info to chipdb.org. _________________ My collection: http://www.cpucollection.se :::::: http://www.chipdb.org Photos of chips you never knew existed. Now over 6000 different chips in the database. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
found a brother of this chip. Only difference is 9746CJAW vs. 9746BJAW
How many of these are out there in your collection? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sorry wasn`t logged in...
btw. the price label on the back says 699,-DM = ca. 357€ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Found another 3.3V misprint but this time from week 47/1997 and with MALAY markings! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| here the other ones I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|