| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bonsai Bill
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 32 Location: Vancouver Is., Canada
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:25 am Post subject: Question |
|
|
Hello again, my daughter was just given a comp that has an AMD 2400+ running at 2.0 Ghz and I have an AMD 2500+ that runs at 1.83 Ghz (default speeds) sitting in a closet from when I upgraded my machine. Is there any performance advantage to replacing the 2400 with the 2500 seeing as how the 2400 runs at a faster speed?
If so, could you please explain why? I do know that the 2400 has a higher multiplier but I really don't understand how that effects performance output.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 2500+ has a higher rating because it has more L2 cache memory than the 2400+, and it runs on a faster system bus, which overcomes its 170 MHz frequency deficit.
Note that the motherboard must support 166 MHz system bus and 333 DDR memory (PC2700) in order to get the benefit of a performance boost. Otherwise, it isn't worth changing the processor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
|