| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:17 am Post subject: my 2nd pentium fake, 3rd, 4th.... 7th |
 |
|
just realised something wasnt right with the SL25N i had when i got another. 
my first one didnt have an attached heat-sink.. then i realised it had the wrong part number 
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html
Last edited by Neon_WA on Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:28 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Update
deciding that an extra plastic layer had been applied to the base of the cpu i had a poke around and scraped away at the area where the sSpec was.
Underneath was the original sSpec of SL27H
to confirm i scraped the start of the part number, showing FV for FV80503166
Some major overclocking would of been happening, running a 166 processor at 233MHz (40% overclock )
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Elar
Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Posts: 746
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: |
Some major overclocking would of been happening, running a 166 processor at 233MHz (40% overclock ) |
I did run one for several years from 166 to 262,5 with stock voltage, rock solid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cpuswe
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 2214
Location: Karlskrona, Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
No probs.. will do 
i had a look around and i noticed the same font as my fake on one of CPUShack's cpu pics there
Intel Pentium FV80503233 SL27S MALAY diff font
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: |
No probs.. will do
i had a look around and i noticed the same font as my fake on one of CPUShack's cpu pics there
Intel Pentium FV80503233 SL27S MALAY diff font |
entirely possible lol
damned fakers
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
done
when it get time i'll put up pics of my P4 xeons & a few others cpus not pictured there.
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
checking the 200 & 233 pentiums i have, i found another fake 
this one had a non-standard heat sink glued on it, before i removed it.
the 166 in the corner having been remarked with 233. there is no signs of grinding of the processor face
on the bottom had some barcode stickers running down each side. the bottom on inspection appears to have been repainted then remarked.
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
just realised that the real markings on the CPU make it the youngest ceramic pentium in my collection
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: |
i had a look around and i noticed the same font as my fake on one of CPUShack's cpu pics there
Intel Pentium FV80503233 SL27S MALAY diff font |
on reflection the font doesn't look that different.. so it probably not a fake
but one of Jac's is unusual the "Intel Pentium FV80503233 Q326", cos the TM symbol is positioned on the line different from all other PPGA (Q or S varieties) pentiums
http://www.chipdb.org/img-intel-pentium-fv80503233-q326-3449.htm
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JAC
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 3469
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | | Neon_WA wrote: |
i had a look around and i noticed the same font as my fake on one of CPUShack's cpu pics there
Intel Pentium FV80503233 SL27S MALAY diff font |
on reflection the font doesn't look that different.. so it probably not a fake
but one of Jac's is unusual the "Intel Pentium FV80503233 Q326", cos the TM symbol is positioned on the line different from all other PPGA (Q or S varieties) pentiums
http://www.chipdb.org/img-intel-pentium-fv80503233-q326-3449.htm |
Looking at those pentiums, yes the TM is higher up, but I think mine is also the only one with an I prefix on the long code, the others are C or L
I for Malaysia
http://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10537&highlight=intel+plant+code |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chook
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 2250
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | checking the 200 & 233 pentiums i have, i found another fake
this one had a non-standard heat sink glued on it, before i removed it.
the 166 in the corner having been remarked with 233. there is no signs of grinding of the processor face
on the bottom had some barcode stickers running down each side. the bottom on inspection appears to have been repainted then remarked. |
I believe I have one of these. It has an Intel heatsink/fan on it and I haven't removed it yet, but the 233 in the corner looks like yours, with no sign of re-etching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
this is my lastest fake i ended up with
a 166 SL23X remarked as a 233 SL293
the bottom was repainted and remarked
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
in my search of the verge (aka kerbside) collections I found a fully working ultra-sonic bath cleaner
So i thought i would give it a try on a pentium that had thermal paste that wouldnt come off.
It was working well not just on the thermal paste but also the printing underneath
So my SX963 A80502-100 Pentium that i didnt even give an inkling of being a fake had a surprise for me.
looking at it now, knowing its a fake.. the only thing strange is the gap between 92 & 93 etched on the top
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does the chip still work after being cleaned using ultrasonics? If you are not sure whether it worked before, do you have a cheap duplicate that works that you could test that way? I might buy one if it doesn't kill the core 
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
