| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:26 am Post subject: it looks like genuine, but... |
 |
|
it looks like genuine, but it is said it should be in PLASTIC pga package.  
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
it looks real, nice find 
what is the date code?
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
el_gecko
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 1553
Location: Nice, France
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ceramic looks like porous so I assume it has been sanded and remarked
_________________
My microprocessor collection: The Gecko's CPU Library |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
x86sniper
Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 179
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is fake
Original fansink will not leave such a mark on the CPU
It is nearly always a prefect circular shape and reddish in color. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| x86sniper wrote: | It is fake
Original fansink will not leave such a mark on the CPU
It is nearly always a prefect circular shape and reddish in color. |
sounds convincing
this is what I suspected except the font looks like real.
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
smithy
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 2906
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Almost convincing, but if you have a look at the two "0" in the bottom left hand corner (the "200"), they are different! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| smithy wrote: | | Almost convincing, but if you have a look at the two "0" in the bottom left hand corner (the "200"), they are different! |
you remind me of this. yes, they are almost same, but not exactly same
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| x86sniper wrote: | It is fake
Original fansink will not leave such a mark on the CPU
It is nearly always a prefect circular shape and reddish in color. |
Putting aside that it is ceramic.. if you go by the sSpec this comes with an UNATTACHED heat-sink. So someone could of used a different glue.
But then ones with unattached heat-sinks have "intel pentium (R) w/ MMX tech" on the top in white print and no speed engraved in the corner.
I personally dont have an issue with the font of the engraving as this picture resolution. 
Hugo do you have an hi-res pics of the engraving on top?
What does the font on the bottom look like?
edit >> intel have had other sSPecs in both CPGA and PPGA, but i have never seen them to vary on whether a heat-sink is attached or not within a sSPec.
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html
Last edited by Neon_WA on Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hugo929 wrote: | here is the bottom pic
|
The font is a little bold (not really an issue) otherwise font shape is perfect and it matches perfectly.
My only two issues are the couple of dark brown patches (bottom left is the largest)... are they marks on the surface or is it where paint is flaking?
and the die cap surface appears to have no shine
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
x86sniper
Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 179
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
found a reference to what a genuine factory-installed heatsink would look like when it is removed
notice the shape of circular mark and the residue
http://www.chipdb.org/img-intel-bp80503200-sl23x-fake-6645.htm
btw, I agreed that on the questioning pentium, mark on back side is slightly bolder |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it is interesting this is the first Boxed Pentium fake I see which the markings under HS are remarked......
_________________
My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
