| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:30 pm Post subject: Move along.. just another fake |
 |
|
found yesterday afternoon 
have studied it since then and its not going into the fake box yet 
just trying to work out how to take better picks of the etched markings on the base. When the sun comes up, I will try and take better pics.
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html
Last edited by Neon_WA on Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:22 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a better pic of the laser markings
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:53 pm Post subject: Re: Picture says 1000 words |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | | have studied it since then and its not going into the fake box |
Do you have more than two boxes?  The markings on the back are so unusual that I'd say it's a fake. They look like somebody copied them from the back of plastic PGA processors.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also, "INTEL" and copyright look different than on the front of other boxed processors. Datecode/lot combination is the same as on the page below (see comments) but the factory is different:
http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL2BM.html
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gshv wrote: | Also, "INTEL" and copyright look different than on the front of other boxed processors. Datecode/lot combination is the same as on the page below (see comments) but the factory is different:
http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL2BM.html
Gennadiy |
Ok, i didnt want to do it, but i will pop the heatsink off
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FAKE  FAKE FAKE FAKE
its a SL27K 
so the one posted on the SL2BM page will be a fake to.
| CPUShack wrote: | | where is the ICOMP marking? |
i have quite a few box without the iComp
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | | so the one posted on the SL2BM page will be a fake to. |
I bet it is. BTW, I corrected the SL2BM page - I removed a note about ceramic package.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:57 pm Post subject: Re: Picture says 1000 words |
|
|
| gshv wrote: | | Neon_WA wrote: | | have studied it since then and its not going into the fake box |
Do you have more than two boxes? |
I'm slow this morning... i didnt pick up that humour 
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chook
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 2250
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've come across two of these ceramic P233MMX chips. I removed the heatsink from one of them and it was a 166 (can't recall the sspec) like Neon_WA's one. I've kept the other one intact. The intact one is marked as SL293.
I've been cataloguing my collection and I've found a surprising number of fakes. It must have been quite a widespread practice in its day. I found a Pentium 133 that looks fairly normal on the top.
Until you look at the bottom side.
Both these sspecs refer to P133, but as the chip has two different sspecs, I assume that its fake! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CPUShack
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hugo929
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 6163
Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
