| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JoshGlzBrk
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:36 am Post subject: i7 comparison question. |
|
|
I'm buying a new highend laptop soon, (hopefully monday), but I was wondering which cpu would be best (fastest).
I know one is dual core and one is quad, but the dual core has a faster base clock speed compared to the quad, should I just go with the dual core based on the faster base speed and faster overclock (turbo) speed?
http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=43124,43560 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pickelo Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well it depends on what you are going to be running on the system.
Not a lot of software is optimised for a Quad Core processor. So you won't see a great improvement in performance over the Dual Core processor.
The only real software that would see an increase in performance by using the Quad Core is Video Encoding and Raytracing.
Everything else like Browsing the web, flash videos, office suites and even games will see much better performance with the Dual Core processor.
Which by the way uses a lot less power and will result in a cooler running notebook and one that lasts longer when running off the battery.
I'd go with the Dual Core. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JoshGlzBrk
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I'M a programmer and I run quite a few things at once, don't really play games on the pc, have a PS3 for that.
Do you happen to know the speeds of the i7 820QM at each of the # of cores in use and on turbo, and the clock speeds for the 620M also? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JoshGlzBrk
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So personally, which would you choose for a performance laptop that won't be used for games? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Qwerty

Joined: 20 May 2005 Posts: 3141 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Personally, I would buy a desktop instead of a laptop.
Almost all high-end laptops tend to overheat. It doesn't make much sense to have a super-duper CPU in the rig if it will run at 50% or 25% to prevent overheating
You should also know that the high-end laptops (they are also called "desktop replacement") consume much energy and therefore have a very short battery operaing time. All the power saving techniques throttle the CPU power or deactivate the superfluous CPU cores to achieve longer working time on batteries.
IMHO if you want a high-end machine you should buy a desktop and if you want to be mobile - you should purchase laptop with a low-power CPU and long battery operating time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cobracon

Joined: 28 Aug 2007 Posts: 216 Location: Roosterpoot, MS; US of A (Obama country!)
|
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qwerty wrote: | Personally, I would buy a desktop instead of a laptop.
Almost all high-end laptops tend to overheat. It doesn't make much sense to have a super-duper CPU in the rig if it will run at 50% or 25% to prevent overheating
You should also know that the high-end laptops (they are also called "desktop replacement") consume much energy and therefore have a very short battery operaing time. All the power saving techniques throttle the CPU power or deactivate the superfluous CPU cores to achieve longer working time on batteries.
IMHO if you want a high-end machine you should buy a desktop and if you want to be mobile - you should purchase laptop with a low-power CPU and long battery operating time. |
Well said, and ABSOLUTELY correct. _________________ "Have you scanned the RAM timings for Operator's Headspace?? Too much real estate between the audio collectors will block the connection which allows proper operation of your computer."_Cobra
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|