| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:04 am Post subject: CPU-World information - Part 3 |
 |
|
I dont like really long threads.. makes it hard searching.. so split it up and started a 3rd one
I noticed an error regarding CPUid on the PODP5V63 page
presently is
CPUID 1531 (SU013, SZ953, SZ990)
should be
1531 (SZ953, SZ990)
1532 (SU013)
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The error was on the SU013 s-spec page, and incorrect CPUID came from Intel spec update. I fixed it (I mean the S-spec page, not the s-spec update  ). Thank you!
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
will be last thing on your list.. but new scripts for sSpecs may change the outcome anyway
duplicate sSpecs are dealt with in forum, but if you use the bulk sSpec page seems to default to listing the non CPU part first (but it may just default to first part in database)
but if you click on sSpec takes you to the CPU part page
an example of a sSpec used for CPU & non CPU
Q810 ( 82801AB)
Q811 ( 82801AB)
way way down the track.. wonder if another colour could be used to highlight sSpecs that are in database more than once when using bulk sSpec page
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It has passed my mind a few times, but now with new CPU submission page think it might be pertinent
I think most submission pages (also maybe comments) start with oldest at top.. if only a few submissions not a issue
but if there is a lot wouldn't it best (if it can) have the newest first going to oldest?
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
another you might want to put on your list.. for when you have nothing to do 
You have listed for Ezra & Samuel 2 C3s
Floating Point Unit >> Integrated, running at 1/2 speed
but for Samuel C3s you have
Floating Point Unit >> Integrated
even though they also only run at 1/2 speed also
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I added it to my list of things to do.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fixed. Thank you!
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robev
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3693
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| gshv wrote: |
Fixed. Thank you!
Gennadiy |
Still shows as "batter" instead of "battery"
_________________
The Older they are the Better they are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try to refresh the page (Ctrl-R in Firefox and probably other browsers).
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
picur10
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 1229
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Celeron 460 is missing from this page.
Many Sun families missing from the drop down list on the main page. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| picur10 wrote: | | Celeron 460 is missing from this page. |
check listings on the "Samples Only" tab 
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
picur10
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 1229
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | | check listings on the "Samples Only" tab |
ouch   |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D.8080
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| D.8080 wrote: | http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Athlon%2064%203200+%20-%20ADA3200AIO4BX%20%28ADA3200BXBOX%29.html
Typo: TDP 59W, shouldn't be 89?
I see other 59W for 754... big series of typos or I missed something that i'm about to learn. |
ADAxxxxAEPxxx had 1.5 core voltage. ADAxxxxAIKxxx had lower 1.4 V voltage, and lower TDP. I don't remember which source I used, but it probably came from older revisions of "AMD Athlon 64 Processor Power and Thermal Data Sheet". You can find the latest version of it on AMD website. It still has data for ADA3000AIK4BX CPU, which is rated at 51 Watt TDP.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
