| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're right, the bottom has 8101 datecode. I think that I replaced the picture years ago, and forgot to update the description. I corrected it. Thank you!
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for returning to tabs on the front page.
I like tabs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I removed the tabs only from the news / site news section. I changed the appearance of the top section, but the tabs were there. If they didn't work for you then you probably had an old version of main CPU_World javascript or CSS file cached by your browser. Javascript errors on the page or slow connection with ad sever may also break them, which, by the way, was one of the reasons why I decided to get rid of tabs on other pages.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, it was probably my browser's stale cache then. I thought maybe you made changes for mobile compatibility.
On a related topic, would it be a good idea to put a direct link to the AMD K7 family on the vintage cpus page? Probably most of us don't consider K7 as "vintage", but there is no room on the timeline on the main page, and there is no direct link. Alternately, it is possible to navigate there from the K8 family page. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I added K7 family to the Vintage tab.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Birdman.

Joined: 13 Nov 2012 Posts: 833 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's still that old misplaced die shot AMD 5x86-P75 with incorrect name at Intel 80486 family page. That's really AMD 5K86 or K5 with SSA/5 core and should thus be on the K5 family page instead.
I've also taken quite many missing die shots including several Am486, so I hope that my die shots could be used some day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you. It looks neat.
| gshv wrote: | I added K7 family to the Vintage tab.
Gennadiy |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
QFNH lists incorrect package type 478-pin FC-mPGA4
guessing should be 775-land FC-LGA4 _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I changed the part number. Eventually I will link it and other HH80551PG*1M samples to proper Pentium D pages.
| Neon_WA wrote: | QFNH lists incorrect package type 478-pin FC-mPGA4
guessing should be 775-land FC-LGA4 |
Fixed.
Thank you for corrections!
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antinomy
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 243
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2014 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| debs3759 wrote: | | Socket 370 Coppermine processors up to at least 1.0BGHz support 2-way multiprocessing |
I didnt get what you meant at 1st.. now I see when you click 2-way tab only SECC parts show
Looking at spec update all desktop Coppermine P3 support 2-way, except cA2 stepping which were not validated for Dual processing
Also desktop Coppermine-T are validated for Dual processing, but only listed as 1-way _________________ There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I checked the datasheet, and it seems that all socket 370 Coppermine processors support dual-processing. I updated the site. Thank you!
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
The C7-M datasheet claims that it supports dual-processing.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|