| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
isa-d
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 2984
Location: Italy
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:32 pm Post subject: K6-2+/533 ACZM |
 |
|
| There is an auction with this CPU not present in your database, if needed I will post the link |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It'd be interesting to see a picture (if there is one).
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isa-d
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 2984
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| not a great picture but come from the auction |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| isa-d wrote: | | not a great picture but come from the auction |
do you know what OEM it is from?
other ones not in DB are
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZM
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | other ones not in DB are
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZM |
Yes, I know... After first isa-d's post I looked at other ACZM processors, and compiled a small list of steppings and date codes. My goal was to see if the ACZM processors are different from ACZ, or if they are the same chips with old/new style of markings, depending on their production date. Here is my list:
--- 450 ---
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZM A 0005FPAW ES (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZM A 0006BPBW E.S. (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZM A 0009FPBW (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZM A 0012MPMW (PCA)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZ A 0015MPMW (PCA)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZ A 0019MPMW (CMDE)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZ A 0022FPMW
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZM A 0025MPMW (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZ A 0031APMW (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZ A 0033MPM (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/450ACZ A 0037MPM (X86G)
--- 475 ---
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM A 0005OPBW ES (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM A 0006BPBW E.S. (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM A 0006BPAW (PCA)
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM A 0012MPMW (CCCA)
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM A 0009FPBW (X86G)
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM A 0013APDW (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZ A 0017EPBW (X86G)
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZ A 0022BPAW
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZ A 0023MPM (PCA)
AMD-K6-2+/475ADZM A 0004CPAW (2.1V) CW
--- 500 ---
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZM A 0005EPAW ES (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZM A 0006APCW (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZM A 0013MPMW (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZ A 0025CPDW (OCCZ)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZ A 0030DPEW (X86G)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZ A 0032MPMW (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZ A 0033APBW (CI)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZ A 0037MPMW (PCA)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZ A 0039DPMW (X86G)
--- 533 ---
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ* A 0025MPM? (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ A 0028DPMW (EB)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ* A 0030MPM (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ A 0030CPMW (CCSE)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ* A 0031MPM (CCCA)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ A 0036EPAW (PCA)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ A 0037MPMW (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ* A 0037MPM (OCCZ)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ A 0039DPBW (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ* A 0041MPM (CS)
AMD-K6-2+/533ACZ A 0043MPMW (EB)
--- 550 ---
AMD-K6-2+/550ACZ A 0020DPBW (X86G)
AMD-K6-2+/550ACZ A 0024EPAW (CHDB)
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZ A 0026VPEW
AMD-K6-2+/550ACZ A 0029CPFW (EB)
AMD-K6-2+/550ACZ A 0031EPDW (EB)
AMD-K6-2+/550ACZ A 0040CPCW (OCCZ)
AMD-K6-2+/550ACZ A 0042MPMW
AMD-K6-2+/550ACZ A 0044EPFW? (CW)
--- 570 ---
AMD-K6-2+/570ACZ A 0020OPMW (CS)
AMD-K6-2+/570ACZ A 0021BPAW
AMD-K6-2+/570ACZ A 0026MPMW (EB)
AMD-K6-2+/570ACZ A 0030BPAW (CW)
AMD-K6-2+/570ACZ A 0031EPMW (CW)
The letters in parenthesis is the abbreviation of the source (CW - CPU-World, CHDB - ChipDB, etc). My theory was that, starting from engineering samples, all K6-2+ mobiles used ACZM suffix, and later switched to ACZ suffix. The theory may be incorrect because there is an overlap in date ranges between AMD-K6-2+/450ACZ and AMD-K6-2+/450ACZM chips. There is no overlap for 475 and 500 MHz parts. I don't know what to think at this point...
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another thing I wanted to check if there is any correlation between "*" at the end of part number and production date. As you can see from the list, there were K6-2+ 533 MHz chips with and without the asterisk produced same week.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
top of my list at the moment... is that is marking for a particular OEM
like the * (star) is likely for IBM or other OEMs
guessing nothing different with actual processor.. but more likely the testing regime
here is old list of K6 with & without the * I made a while ago
http://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11335&
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gshv
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I added three ACZM processors to the site.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isa-d
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 2984
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon_WA wrote: | | isa-d wrote: | | not a great picture but come from the auction |
do you know what OEM it is from?
other ones not in DB are
AMD-K6-2+/475ACZM
AMD-K6-2+/500ACZM |
No, he don't specify from which laptop come the processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
