| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:05 pm Post subject: How to distinguish between VIA EZRA and EZRA-T? |
|
|
Need your help, thanks.
Jedi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unzlbunzl

Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 468 Location: Graz, Austria
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ezra-T uses Tualatin pinout (so it wont work in Coppermine boards), and higher speed C3s use -xxxAMhz suffix, maybe the A signals the new core/Bus Interface |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, well I know that Ezra-T is capable of running in most Tualatin-boards (not Siemens! ) .
But I just wanted to know, how to distinguish by markings, any hints?
I have three VIA C3 here:
a) VIA C3 - 750 MHz (100x7,5) 1.35V
b) VIA C3 - 933 MHZ (133x7.0) 1.35V
c) VIA C3 - 1.0AGHz (133x7.5) 1.4V
voltage should indicate EZRA core but T?
Jedi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isa-d

Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 2984 Location: Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I missed this thread earlier in the week....
Ezra and Ezra-T both work with 1.35V, so that voltage could be either. I believe that externally the only difference is the pinout. Internally, I believe (although I need to verify this - it's a long time since I put the info into my CPUID code and info...) that the Ezra has CPUID 0678-F and the Ezra-T has CPUID 0680-7.
The only C3 core I am able to verify as running at 1.4V is the Nehemiah core.
Also note that the Samuel 2 operates at between 1.6V and 1.7V (650AMHz and 667AMHz versions are known which operate at 1.5V), so none of the chips you show above are Samuel 2. The first 2 could be Ezra or Ezra-T and the 3rd is probably Nehemiah  _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:24 am Post subject: Here pictures... n.t. |
|
|
| maybe easier to identify |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:47 am Post subject: and here the backsides |
|
|
| sorry for image quality, but they were made with my mobile |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
faber

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Posts: 315 Location: Poznan, Poland
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've some question too
Nehemiah
or
Ezra
I think it's Nehemiah LowPower but ... Socket370  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedi08

Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 463
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
So nobody with a clue?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi: as stated above, to get any more information than you have already been given, you need to test the chips and give CPUID readouts.
Faber: Low Power Nehemiah. These are all 370-pin SPGA w/ Integrated Heatspreader _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
faber

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Posts: 315 Location: Poznan, Poland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| debs3759 wrote: | | ... Faber: Low Power Nehemiah. These are all 370-pin SPGA w/ Integrated Heatspreader |
I thought that LP Nehemiah was only in EBGA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|