Interesting die shots

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Die photography, wafers and memorabilia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chiefish



Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 2153
Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A

PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:44 pm    Post subject: Interesting die shots Reply with quote

I was bored tonight and decided to take out my microscope to look at some die shots pf some of the old Intel eproms I have and discovered that a 1701 grey and a 1702 grey have the exact sme markings on them . I also have an early grey 1702a and took a look at that die and heres what I found. What is the difference between the 1701 and the 1702 , or does anyone know any visible differences between the two to look for? the last shot is of a 1702a grey,Just for the hell of it I also looked at a Micro Intl 1701 i have.
_________________
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E.


Last edited by Chiefish on Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:05 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
Chiefish



Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 2153
Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A

PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

heres the shot of the Micro Int 1701, and a c1702a
_________________
"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
CPUShack



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The four devices 1601, 1602, 1701, and 1702 use identical chips. The 1601 and 1701 is operable in both
the static and dynamic mode while the 1602 and 1702 is operable in the static mode only.

In the beginning of 1970 the market needs for this chip was enormous but the yield of the first 1702
production was very poor. On each functional chip there were hundreds of unusable chips. After
modification of chip architecture from parallel in serial design and including the Walkout (put the chips
under high negative voltage) into the manufacturing process the production yield suddenly increased to 60
chips per wafer. After modification of this production process the chip was marked 1702A

_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!

Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
D.8080



Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 1474
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting.
Great pics.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
max3



Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 430
Location: DREAM LAND

PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is quite a few interesting things you may see under the scope... i have 1000x biological microscope and looked at many dies/things, some even have names of engineers (i guess like first and last names Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
msze



Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 143
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, I have to get myself a microscope! Great pictures...

If anyone is interested in GPU dies, tom's hardware put up a good selection of Nvidia CPU dies (from Riva TNT to current GTX 200):
http://www.tomshardware.com/picturestory/524-nvidia-gpu-graphics.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Die photography, wafers and memorabilia All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group