| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:22 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| smithy wrote: | Here are mine:
SU084 V1.0 L6383220-1884
|
Smithy can you supply a pic to check it ok 
there seem a lot of the late production SU084s are actually remarked 150s
Chook.. the only SU084 i can find for week 42 is actually a remark.
So until Smithy gets back with a pic.. the newest genuine i can find is week 32
the suss SU084
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
smithy
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 2906
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here are the front and back pics...what do you think?
I have more "normal" L6064256-0157 as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| smithy wrote: | Here are the front and back pics...what do you think?
|
I would have too put it down as a Remark/fake 166 from a 150 mate 
i picked up a faked SZ959 today... very good quality... remarked from a 75 OD
There seems to be at lot hard to find chips that have ended up in remarker hands 
486 OD 50s into 66s
486 OD 75s into 100s
Pentium OD (non-MMX & MMX) 150s into 166s
and some P1 MMX 180s into 200
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
smithy
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 2906
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, thought it might be...lucky I have a real one
_________________
My former Intel collection:
www.smithschips.com.au |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon_WA
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 7146
Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| smithy wrote: | | Yep, thought it might be...lucky I have a real one |
I forgot to say... it would be the newest SU083 if that what it is underneath
As I know for a fact the production date would of been week 35 or newer
may even be a SU124 underneath 
_________________
There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't. ~Author Unknown
http://www.x86-guide.net/Neon-WA/en/collection.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
smithy
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 2906
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just got this today....2 weeks later than latest in timeline:
SL2FF V2.0 L7463417-0302
_________________
My former Intel collection:
www.smithschips.com.au |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qwerty
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 3141
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The overdrives in my collection:
SU125 (L6254932-0022) - 25 week 96
SL24W (L7333274-0187) - 33 week 97 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qwerty
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 3141
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pictures... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chook
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 2250
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I picked up this SZ959 DX4-100 the other day. Four weeks younger than current youngest.
_________________
General failure reading disk in drive A
Who's General Failure and why is he reading my disk? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robev
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3693
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is my SL24W
Week 3 1997 makes it reasonably early
_________________
The Older they are the Better they are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robev
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3693
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Smithy's new find will need to be added to the timeline won't it?
_________________
The Older they are the Better they are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chook
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 2250
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
It has been added to the timeline and my want list. 
_________________
General failure reading disk in drive A
Who's General Failure and why is he reading my disk? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robev
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3693
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have just bought what I believe to be a very early SL24W although I cannot confirm that it is such as it is still sealed in it's plastic container.
However it is a PODPMT66X166 and the Font Style is the earlier type.
Note the style of the 6's and if I am right this will have a date code of around week 37 of 1996.
Your thoughts please
_________________
The Older they are the Better they are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robev
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3693
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have just bought this SU002 but it doesn't appear to feature on the Overdrive timeline.
Can it be added please
I note that smithy has one in his collection with a date code of week 16 of 1996 and mine has a date code of week 31 of 1996.
_________________
The Older they are the Better they are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chook
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 2250
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice chip! My one is missing a little bit of print.
Added to the timeline.
These SU series Overdrives are being found a bit more lately. They were as rare as hens teeth a while ago.
_________________
General failure reading disk in drive A
Who's General Failure and why is he reading my disk? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
