| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neon_WA

Joined: 08 Nov 2008 Posts: 7146 Location: Margaret River, West Australia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hugo929

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 6163 Location: China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isa-d

Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 2984 Location: Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hugo929

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 6163 Location: China
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have known it is a nanoprocessor as 1692. just as the while ceramic one you won at ebay _________________ My vintage CPU collection:www.cpumuseum.com
Chinese Forum: http://www.cpumuseum.com/forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chiefish

Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 2153 Location: Northwest N.J. U.S.A
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hugo929 wrote: | | i have known it is a nanoprocessor as 1692. just as the while ceramic one you won at ebay |
Correct, they are both Nanoprocessors, heres two examples.
The handwriiten voltages are because they each were individually tested to see what volts were needed to rum properly. _________________ "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." A.E. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|