| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:11 am Post subject: When is it Chompers, when is it CXT? |
|
|
So, I need to learn and expand my collection with some K6's thus knowledge
Which K6-2 are Chompers' and which are CXT's? The info section here is not 100% conclusive?
The story is, I'm making a sheet with the different varieties, to be able to check, which I have, and which I'm missing .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 4015 Location: Estonia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, problem is, I need to map out, which variants are made, so I need which ones to have ..? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Given the info in that old thread - which I can see is partly info from Wikipedia, but can I expect those to be correct, i.e.;
Chomper: 233, 266, 300, 333, and 350
CXT: 266, 300, 333, 350, 366, 380, 400, 427.5, 450, 475, 500, 533, and 550
Thus 266, 300, 333 and 350 can be both? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here are data from my collection, desktop K6-2 only.
[580 - Chomper]:
AMD-K6-2/266AFR
AMD-K6 3D/300AFR
AMD-K6-2/300AFR
AMD-K6-2/333AFR
AMD-K6-2/350AFR
(note: most K6-300 are [570 - Little Foot], but some are [580 - Chomper]).
[584 - Chomper]:
AMD-K6-2/300AFR (note: only 1 example, maybe rare)
[58C - Chomper CXT]:
AMD-K6-2/200AFR
AMD-K6-2/233AFR
AMD-K6-2/266AFR
AMD-K6-2/300AFR-66
AMD-K6-2/333AFR
AMD-K6-2-333AFR-66
AMD-K6-2 38L3054
AMD-K6-2/350AFR
AMD-K6-2/366AFR
AMD-K6-2/380AFR
AMD-K6-2/400AFQ
AMD-K6-2/400AFR
AMD-K6-2/450AFX
AMD-K6-2/450AHX
AMD-K6-2/475AFX
AMD-K6-2/475AHX
AMD-K6-2/500AFX
AMD-K6-2/533AFX
AMD-K6-2/550AGR
[not tested]:
AMD-K6 3D/266AFR
AMD-K6-2/337AFR
AMD-K6-2/400AHX
AMD-K6-2/450AGX
AMD-K6-2/475AHR
AMD-K6-2/550AFX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon wrote: | Here are data from my collection, desktop K6-2 only.
[580 - Chomper]:
AMD-K6-2/266AFR
AMD-K6 3D/300AFR
AMD-K6-2/300AFR
AMD-K6-2/333AFR
AMD-K6-2/350AFR
(note: most K6-300 are [570 - Little Foot], but some are [580 - Chomper]).
[584 - Chomper]:
AMD-K6-2/300AFR (note: only 1 example, maybe rare)
[58C - Chomper CXT]:
AMD-K6-2/200AFR
AMD-K6-2/233AFR
AMD-K6-2/266AFR
AMD-K6-2/300AFR-66
AMD-K6-2/333AFR
AMD-K6-2-333AFR-66
AMD-K6-2 38L3054
AMD-K6-2/350AFR
AMD-K6-2/366AFR
AMD-K6-2/380AFR
AMD-K6-2/400AFQ
AMD-K6-2/400AFR
AMD-K6-2/450AFX
AMD-K6-2/450AHX
AMD-K6-2/475AFX
AMD-K6-2/475AHX
AMD-K6-2/500AFX
AMD-K6-2/533AFX
AMD-K6-2/550AGR
[not tested]:
AMD-K6 3D/266AFR
AMD-K6-2/337AFR
AMD-K6-2/400AHX
AMD-K6-2/450AGX
AMD-K6-2/475AHR
AMD-K6-2/550AFX |
Thanks for that very comprehensive list!
I'd guess that any K6 3D would be Chompers, as the name changed to K6-2 rather soon after launch?
And I don't get what you mean by the note I've colored red. Chompers was AFAIK never a K6, but always K6-3D or K6-2?
Back in the day, I actually didn't know that K6 was made in 300 - I thought it was only the K6-2 ..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Oh, and by the way - does the K6 core in 350nm have a name - the 250nm is LittleFoot, but what about the original? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neon

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 1512 Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would also guess that K6 3D would be Chompers.
The note in red pertains to a few K6-300, which is not what you asked about, but I thought maybe interesting. I guess that some of the Chompers silicon was used to fill demand for K6 chips?
I have not seen a nickname for 350nm K6. It's a strange absence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2020 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon wrote: |
The note in red pertains to a few K6-300, which is not what you asked about, but I thought maybe interesting. I guess that some of the Chompers silicon was used to fill demand for K6 chips? |
Yeah, that would make sense, of course .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
H3nrik V!

Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 1246 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| So, I have this 350 in 26050 packaging - but no way to know whether Chompers or CXT without using CPUID? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|