| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ApostolCV
Joined: 26 May 2020
Posts: 207
Location: Ukraine
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:02 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi!
I know it is a crazy things but did someone delid 478 EM64T
Pentium4?
Are the crystals of P4 E stepping with and w/o EMT4 the same on physical level? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carlos S. M.
Joined: 18 Jun 2020
Posts: 102
Location: Canary Islands
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
CPU validation on ASUS P4P800 SE: https://valid.x86.fr/vlp7zg
Need to do on a 64 bit OS, but can confirm at least the setup of Windows XP x64 boots without complaints
HWINFO for some reason reports the SL7QB as an SL88K |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wasmachineman_NL
Joined: 04 Jul 2019
Posts: 988
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Report it to Martin, he replies quite quickly for HWiNFO bug reports. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
debs3759
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 9477
Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
An sSpec can only be detected on most chips by guessing from the CPUID data. SL7QB and SL88K are the same as far as most software is concerned, and he may not have known about the presence of EM64T instructions when he coded this.
_________________
My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
frag_
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 4015
Location: Estonia
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's rare case when sspec can be determined by software due to unique 64 bit capability.
But there are hundreds of sspecs not distinguishable by software.
I think HWiNFO should at least warn user with red letters - "It's quessed sspec, I don't really know!".
Or better to remove this feature instead of providing misleading information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wasmachineman_NL
Joined: 04 Jul 2019
Posts: 988
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| frag_ wrote: | It's rare case when sspec can be determined by software due to unique 64 bit capability.
But there are hundreds of sspecs not distinguishable by software.
I think HWiNFO should at least warn user with red letters - "It's quessed sspec, I don't really know!".
Or better to remove this feature instead of providing misleading information. |
Reminds me of this:
Imagine if it actually was a T7600G, holy shit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esasoft
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:40 pm Post subject: Board which worked with SL7QB and x64 |
|
|
| Carlos S. M. wrote: | | Board which worked with SL7QB and x64 |
Biostar G31-M4 - works great (you need to add some good and active cooling to VRM).
There is a patched BIOS for it on bios-mods.com to overcome TDP limitations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Carlos S. M.
Joined: 18 Jun 2020
Posts: 102
Location: Canary Islands
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ApostolCV wrote: | Hi!
I know it is a crazy things but did someone delid 478 EM64T
Pentium4?
Are the crystals of P4 E stepping with and w/o EMT4 the same on physical level? |
Forgot to mention, Socket 478 prescotts are soldered, so it might be harder to delid
in another topic, added the Biostar G31-M4 to the working board thread |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![[ Hidden ]](https://cdn.cpu-world.com/forum/templates/CPUWorld/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}