| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
raikiri05
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:23 pm Post subject: Need Help Buying New CPU |
|
|
Hello everyone,
Last december I received my computer for christmas. Its a great computer in my eyes but I recently bought a product that needs an AMD Athlon processor 1.6 GHz or higher. Im good with computers but I have limited knowledge of CPU's. This is information about my CPU, I got it from EVEREST.
. Im not sure if this is enough information but this is what I was looking at buying, http://www.pricegrabber.com/search_techspecs_full.php/masterid=8571952. Im trying not to spend over about $120. If you need any more information let me know. Thanks a lot everyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
debs3759

Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 9477 Location: Northampton, Divided Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried installing and running the software? If it is really intended for an AMD Athlon 1.6GHz or later, then it should work on a Sempron, which is faster and later than an Athlon 1.6 _________________ My graphics card database can be found at http://www.gpuzoo.com.
I can resist anything except temptation.
Debs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soeren
Joined: 07 Mar 2006 Posts: 166
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Sempron has less cache than the Athlon..but the Sempron you use is faster..i would keep the Sempron |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're not going to gain anything by "upgrading" to Athlon 64 3000+. Your current processor - Sempron 3400+ - is about as fast as the Athlon 64 3000+.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raikiri05
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the help everyone. The program I was talking about is a Dazzle 90. The system requirments say the minimum requirments is an Intel Pentium 4 or AMD Athlon 1.6GHz or higher. I tried to use it and it doesnt work. I tried it on another computer with an AMD Athlon and it works perfectly. Someone suggested this CPU and im probably going to buy it.
http://www.pricegrabber.com/p__AMD_Athlon_64_3500_Processor,__8098507/search=939+3500
Its much better than the CPU that I recommended earlier. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jd

Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 1562 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Where in the world did all of you get the idea that a Sempron is better and faster then any Athlon?
Aaaaarg, again, I'm sorry to say but, your all wrong here! Just a simple Athlon1700 Kicks any Sempron ,any day ! Heck! Even my kids Athlon 1400 beats my friends Sempron 3200.
Ya ,if I were u, I'd change quickly to Athlon anything ! For an AMD Novice like myself, I hate to put it down like it is, but with over 5 1/2 years of building gamers now, I can only compare it to a Celery(Celeron)!
Note, why do you think the discontinued Sempron in such a hurry
JD  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| GlinGlin wrote: | | Even my kids Athlon 1400 beats my friends Sempron 3200. |
Impossible ...
No body said that Sempron with same clock in same generation is faster than Athlon.
I think Debs thought about Athlon XP 1900+ Palomino (1,6 GHz) which (I can risk) is slower than lowest model of Sempron - 2200+ 1,5 GHz. That Sempron have faster FSB and more additional instructions. Have better OC potencial.
Celerons are comparatible with Semprons at 1 Ghz higher clock.
Sorry for language mistakes but I haven't dictionary at work;) _________________ Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raikiri05
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tried both and it still doesnt work. Thanks for trying to help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand something. That program use some insctructions which have Athlon but not have Sempron ? Or what is other explanation ? Software producer recommend Athlon 1,6 or later but Sempron 64 have all what have Athlon XP 1900+. I give up  _________________ Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| raikiri05 wrote: |
I tried both and it still doesnt work. Thanks for trying to help. |
What exactly happens when you run it? Does it crash?
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raikiri05
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
What exactly happens when you run it? Does it crash?
Gennadiy |
I start up Studio 9 and it runs fine, but when I try to record something with Studio 9 the preview screen turns black and has green lines through it. All I can hear is static and gargled sound but I cant even record that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|