| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
redskin727 Guest
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:06 pm Post subject: better chip, SL793 or SL7PN? |
|
|
| I recently bought a P4 3.4 northwood (SL793), thinking it would run faster than my present chip 3.2E SL7PN. after running benchmarks, the SL793 shows just slightly slower. which chip do you recommend as the best one to keep? they are both socket 478. thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redskin727 Guest
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I left this out of my first post. I am not interested in overclocking, as I have an Intel D875PBZ motherboard which cannot be overclocked. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As for me I would keep the northwood, you will sell it better when you 'll replace it, because it is the highest frequency for socket 478, and because northwood have better reputation.
Btw it is strange that the prescott runs faster. I think it could highly depend on the test. _________________ Register on x86-guide.net to manage and share your collection on-line !
Need to find a x86 ? Go to http://www.x86-guide.net ! Over 12000 chips listed ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Northwood also has lower thermal design power.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redskin727 Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
in 3DMark06, these are the scores:
SL793 SL7PN
SM2.0 838 840
HDR/SM3.0 974 978
CPU 741 975
The 3.2E has a much stronger CPU score in this benchmark. is this a proper indicator of CPU strength? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redskin727 Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry, it didn't format the way I hoped. This should look better:
SL793 (3.4 northwood)
SM2.0 838
HDR/SM3.0 974
CPU 741
SL7PN (3.2E Prescott)
SM2.0 840
HDR/SM3.0 978
CPU 975 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you try to run Sandra tests on these processors?
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redskin727 Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
SiSoft Sandra05 Scores for the 3.4 Northwood (SL793) are as follows:
Arithmetic:
Dhrystone - 10253
Whetstone - 7504
Multi-Media:
Integer - 26074
Floating Point - 36826
I have not tested the 3.2E (SL7PN) as it is not in my system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
So we can't compare directly. I would prefer CPU with slower clock - Prescott. As I good remember Prescott have better OC and you can always have chance to turn up speed of your CPU. _________________ Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redskin727 Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:42 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SiSoft Sandra05 Scores for the 3.4 Northwood (SL793) are as follows:
Arithmetic:
Dhrystone - 10253
Whetstone - 7504
Multi-Media:
Integer - 26074
Floating Point - 36826
The SiSoft Sandra05 scores for the 3.2E Prescott (SL7PN) are:
Arithmetic:
Dhrystone - 9334
Whetstone - 6764
Multi-Media:
Integer - 22983
Floating Point - 30403
The 3.2E Prescott has lower scores, but are these benchmarks accurate?[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marcin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 8519 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Difference is viewable. I think chipset, RAM have no metter on result in SiSoft Sandra CPU tests so P4 Northwood is "faster in these tests". _________________ Visit ABC CPU - Virtual CPU Museum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jd

Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 1562 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Allthough I'm not a fan of Intel...
I would scrap that and go with a Pentium D
JD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mixeur

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4038 Location: Sochaux, France
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jd

Joined: 01 Jan 2006 Posts: 1562 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats it !!!!!!!!!!! Mixeur you did it !
I know what should be done of this "newbie wrong posting problem"
Make a Post topic called ----------> "All newcommers inquires here"
JD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|