| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 7:46 pm Post subject: cyrix |
|
|
im scanning all my cpus, and ive got enough cyrix ones now to warrant giving them their own section on my site..
is the ibm blue lightning dx2 a cyrix design? im going to be including the ibm 6x86 ones with the cyrix's... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is.
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ah cool.
the ibm 6x86 ones are cyrix though.. right |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you mean 'are cyrix' right  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gshv

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 7898 Location: Fairfax, VA USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CPUShack wrote: | They are IBMs own design.
IBM had no liscensing with Cyrix at that point.
Cyrix chip were made mostly by TI. |
Leave and learn... Thanks John!
Gennadiy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking back I think some of the IBM chips did use Cyrix technology.
but the original IBM 486 didnt. (they had a DX33 of their own)
I need to research the transistion point a bit more.
I'll probably end up doing another 'whats on the back of your IBM 486' real soon _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
for chips like this:
http://www.cpudb.com/cyrix.x?c=486slc
is it correct to refer to the package as tsop? (as opposed to cpga, ppga, opga, etc)
also if anyone can verify or provide any information for that chip that'd be great  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ah, tsop is only pins along two sides? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Minuteman

Joined: 21 May 2003 Posts: 331
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
morkork

Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Posts: 447 Location: Nuremberg, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CPUShack

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 34259 Location: State of Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By the way, the Blue Lightning is based on a Cyrix design (thus the copyright Cyrix)
However, it is NOT actually a Cyrix chip.
The dies are remarkably different (even between the Blue Lightning and IBM produced Cyrix chips)
In addition the Cyrix core does not support the MSR (machine Specific Register) where as the IBM DOES.
More to follow.. _________________ New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!
Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skold

Joined: 30 Nov 2003 Posts: 960 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe, but for my purposes, it has a cyrix logo on it, so ill put it up there
i suppose its similar to grouping the fujitsu 8088's in with the intels, but ill keep those seperate
maybe if i get enough IBM chips ill give IBM their own section. those powerpc ones might just do it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|