cyrix
Goto page 1, 2  Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern Chips (Collectible Chips only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
skold



Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 7:46 pm    Post subject: cyrix Reply with quote

im scanning all my cpus, and ive got enough cyrix ones now to warrant giving them their own section on my site..

is the ibm blue lightning dx2 a cyrix design? im going to be including the ibm 6x86 ones with the cyrix's...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
gshv



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it is.

Gennadiy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
CPUShack



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are IBMs own design.

IBM had no liscensing with Cyrix at that point.

Cyrix chip were made mostly by TI.

_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!

Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
skold



Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ah cool.

the ibm 6x86 ones are cyrix though.. right
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
CPUShack



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yah. 686 to MII are IBM (as well as media GX)

Nat Semi also made MediaGX (aka Geode) and MII

_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!

Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
skold



Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you mean 'are cyrix' right Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
gshv



Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7898
Location: Fairfax, VA USA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CPUShack wrote:
They are IBMs own design.

IBM had no liscensing with Cyrix at that point.

Cyrix chip were made mostly by TI.


Leave and learn... Thanks John!

Gennadiy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
CPUShack



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looking back I think some of the IBM chips did use Cyrix technology.

but the original IBM 486 didnt. (they had a DX33 of their own)

I need to research the transistion point a bit more.

I'll probably end up doing another 'whats on the back of your IBM 486' real soon

_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!

Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
skold



Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

for chips like this:

http://www.cpudb.com/cyrix.x?c=486slc

is it correct to refer to the package as tsop? (as opposed to cpga, ppga, opga, etc)

also if anyone can verify or provide any information for that chip that'd be great Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
CPUShack



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

that would be a TQFP Thin Quad Flat Pack
_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!

Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
skold



Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 2:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ah, tsop is only pins along two sides?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Minuteman



Joined: 21 May 2003
Posts: 331

PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Look at this: http://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=package (ok, it doesn't answer to your question but it may help others)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
morkork



Joined: 25 Feb 2003
Posts: 447
Location: Nuremberg, Germany

PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Cyrix Cx486SLC/e is CQFP (Ceramic Quad Flat Package), not TQFP (Thin Quad Flat Package). TQFP is only like 1-2mm thick, like this AMD Am188.
Minuteman wrote:
Look at this: http://www.cpu-collection.de/?tn=0&l0=package (ok, it doesn't answer to your question but it may help others)

Yes, I'll have to enhance this... it covers the most usual processor packages, but there are quite more.
Here is a little overview which also shows SSOP (Shrink Small Outline Package, leads on longer chip sides)/TSOP (Thin Small Outline Package, leads on shorter chip sides): http://www.delec.com/guide/memory/#TSOP
SSOP is typically used for RAM chips on modules and graphic cards, TSOP is commonly used for Flash-chips in USB sticks. I think there also are some embedded versions of the 80186/188 which use SSOP.

For Intel chip packaging please refer to http://www.intel.com/design/packtech/packbook.htm or to the package types overview chapter: http://www.intel.com/design/packtech/ch_02.pdf

BTW, here is a nice article about the evolution of chip packaging from the 1970s to the 90s: http://nina.ecse.rpi.edu/shur/advanced/examples/Electronic%20Packaging.pdf

_________________
..::morkork::..
http://cpu-collection.de
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
CPUShack



Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 34259
Location: State of Jefferson, USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, the Blue Lightning is based on a Cyrix design (thus the copyright Cyrix)

However, it is NOT actually a Cyrix chip.
The dies are remarkably different (even between the Blue Lightning and IBM produced Cyrix chips)

In addition the Cyrix core does not support the MSR (machine Specific Register) where as the IBM DOES.

More to follow..

_________________
New for 2025! The CPU Shack has a co-processor!

Visit The CPU Shack of microprocessor history and information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
skold



Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

maybe, but for my purposes, it has a cyrix logo on it, so ill put it up there

i suppose its similar to grouping the fujitsu 8088's in with the intels, but ill keep those seperate

maybe if i get enough IBM chips ill give IBM their own section. those powerpc ones might just do it Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CPU-World.com forums Forum Index -> Modern Chips (Collectible Chips only) All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group