Mini Review
Intel Celeron M 430 advantages
Intel Pentium D 925 advantages
430 vs 925 estimated performance
The charts in the section below demonstrate performance of Celeron M 430 and Pentium D 925 processors. Performance numbers for Celeron M 430 were determined based on a variety of tests. Results for Pentium D 925 were derived from test results of other microprocessors with the same core and microarchitecture. As a note, the estimate has greater error of margin than results obtained using real-world benchmarks. Additionally, this is an averaged performance, and the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. | |
- Intel Celeron M 430 - Intel Pentium D 925 |
430 vs 925 specifications comparison
The graphs below show the difference between Celeron M 430 and 925 most important features. These characteristics, along with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a processor performs. Darker area on the "On-chip cache" graph is for the On-chip L1 cache. Lighter area is for the L2 cache cache. Although the L2 cache cache is usually larger than the On-chip L1 cache, it is always slower.
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
||||||||||||||||||
- Intel Celeron M 430 - Intel Pentium D 925 | |||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of 430 vs Intel 925 specs can be found in the Specifications section below. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both CPUs you will find in the CPUIDs section.
Pros and Cons summary
Celeron M 430 | Pentium D 925 | |
General recommendations: |
General recommendations: |
|
Drawbacks: |
Drawbacks: |
Similar processors
Celeron M 430 | Pentium D 925 | |
Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Celeron M 430 and Intel 925, however their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.