Mini Review
AMD Athlon 64 FX FX-57 advantages
Picture is not available |
AMD Sempron 150 advantages
![]() |
FX-57 vs 150 estimated performance
The charts below show relative performance of Athlon 64 FX FX-57 and Sempron 150 processors. Results for Sempron 150 were determined based on a variety of tests. Performance numbers for Athlon 64 FX FX-57 were derived from test results of other microprocessors with the same core and microarchitecture. It is important to note that the estimate has greater error of margin than results obtained using real-world benchmarks. Additionally, this is an averaged performance, and the shown results may differ from results, that you may receive in individual tests. | |
- AMD Athlon 64 FX FX-57 - AMD Sempron 150 |
FX-57 vs 150 specifications comparison
The graphs below compare the most important FX-57 and AMD 150 characteristics. These features, as well as an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a CPU performs. Darker area on the "On-chip cache" graph is for the On-chip L1 cache. Lighter area is for the L2 cache cache. While the L2 cache cache is usually larger than the On-chip L1 cache, it is always slower.
Higher is better |
Higher is better |
||||||||||||||||||
- AMD Athlon 64 FX FX-57 - AMD Sempron 150 | |||||||||||||||||||
Higher is better |
Lower is better |
Detailed side by side comparison of FX-57 vs AMD Sempron 150 specs can be found in the Specifications section below. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both processors is located in the CPUIDs section.
Pros and Cons summary
Athlon 64 FX FX-57 | Sempron 150 | |
General recommendations: |
General recommendations: |
|
Drawbacks: |
Drawbacks: |
Similar processors
Athlon 64 FX FX-57 | Sempron 150 | |
Similar CPUs use the same socket and architecture as AMD Athlon 64 FX FX-57 and AMD 150, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different.